Sep 27, 2025 — Recording 4 (13:38) (Part 2)
Sep 27, 2025 — Recording 4 (13:38)
Audio: 20250927-133819.mp3
**1:38pm, exploring the so-called spirituality narrative with unknown communicators surfacing within the “Citizen Tech” phenomena of communication.*
"File duration: 35:03"
"It is 1:38 p.m." [00:05]
"I've got a lot of talking to do before I get to the intersection when I try to fit in some thoughts, maybe some collaboration uh on the spirituality narrative." [00:17]
"defining it." [00:22]
"and capturing uh hopefully some feedback from others on that." [00:29]
"and comments on why it is or is not a public safety threat." [00:36]
"I mean, I think this is obvious." [00:39]
"But remember, there are different people are in different points of the journey that it is, the individual journey of understanding what's they're being exposed to." [00:53]
"And so if you are in the what I call the esoteric beginnings, right?" [01:02]
"The spirituality narrative maybe you may not have experienced the betrayal." [01:08]
"The feeling of betrayal yet that I experienced when I made my way towards the technological awareness." [01:15]
"It's heartbreaking." [01:18]
"It's 1:39 p.m., Saturday, September 27th, 2025." [01:25]
"This is the voice of Sean Christopher Harris, the author of The Discovery of telepathic terrorism." [01:33]
"I'm walking on my way to the intersection now." [01:37]
"I'm very worried about my life ending, but I've made peace with that to the best of my ability." [01:45]
"doing my part to surface uh the the, you know, this what had to surface what has surfaced within this so-called citizen tech phenomena of communication." [02:01]
"So, let's get to it." [02:02]
"paraphrasing the uh one of the last suggestions." [02:10]
"Uh, what was that?" [02:16]
"The spirituality narrative is not a public threat." [02:21]
"It's not a threat to public safety, paraphrasing." [02:24]
"Right?" [02:25]
"So, before we can talk about something as a group, it's very important to define it." [02:31]
"We have potentially many people uh observing right now." [02:37]
"Some may be able to communicate, others may only be tasked with observing." [02:43]
"For example, if you are support." [02:48]
"Um, so, how might you define the spirituality narrative?" [02:55]
"Once you have the definition that everyone agrees to, uh from there you can talk about things like public safety." [03:05]
"It's also is technology in use, right?" [03:09]
"From the distance right now, paraphrasing, whether or not technology in use really is the first question for a lot of people." [03:25]
"So, I'm going to start off with a few things and then I'll open this recording up to capture comments, but feel free to chime in along the way." [03:34]
"From the distance right now, do not record this." [03:40]
"So, the spirituality narrative, I'll take a stab at it." [03:46]
"And you know, this is what it is, and then there's why, which is different." [03:51]
"So, what it is, uh, simply put, it's the suggestion that the voices we're listening to right now surfacing within this so-called citizen technology, citizen tech method of communication are not human beings." [04:10]
"They are spirit world beings." [04:13]
"Spirit world people." [04:16]
"Right?" [04:17]
"And within that group, and so looking at past suggestions, right?" [04:25]
"Well, how what types of spirit beings are there?" [04:29]
"Well, I think my experience reflects the Judeo-Christian model of understanding that is there are Christlike beings and then there are Antichrist-like beings." [04:45]
"And this is based on past suggestions that, for example, paraphrasing, this is not technology." [04:53]
"Uh, what, you know, what I'm here adding people to the euthanization list uh in support of the Antichrist." [05:03]
"That's who I'm speaking with." [05:05]
"right?" [05:06]
"paraphrasing a comment from the past, a past suggestion that emerged within Citizen Tech." [05:13]
"There's also a lot of huge pattern of uh in the beginning of my experience, telepathic visual information that suggests people wearing white robes." [05:26]
"From the distance right now, white robes were very common about a year ago now, right?" [05:38]
"Does anyone have any kind How does everyone feel about this is the author asking how anyone connected to this conversation feels about how I have defined the spirituality uh narrative." [05:56]
"Beginning the repeating process in three, two, one." [06:02]
"So, you're suggesting that the spirituality narrative can be defined as and this is what it is, not why it is." [06:21]
"Yes, that is exactly what I'm saying with 100% accuracy." [06:31]
"I agree with what you're defining it as from the distance." [06:44]
"Would anyone else care to edit or add to what he suggested?" [06:59]
"That's exactly what I said." [07:03]
"That is exactly what I think the spirituality narrative is." [07:15]
"I said no at the beginning." [07:20]
"Your repeating is almost 100%." [07:30]
"Okay, Sean, please continue." [07:36]
"So, the the author continuing now, and end of repeating, now the author myself, uh continuing on why the spirituality narrative is here." [07:50]
"And remember, this is based on past suggestions, not in-person communication with another person, a physical person relationship." [08:01]
"So why let's look at this." [08:05]
"Uh there are a few suggestions." [08:07]
"Uh one paraphrasing, we needed to get this system into use or to the market immediately and we there was an opposition." [08:25]
"Right?" [08:27]
"We had to do it this way for a reason." [08:33]
"And so let's look at that." [08:35]
"So the suggestion is here, though here's some more suggestions." [08:38]
"Paraphrasing, um, we needed to reveal uh the potential threat that we were aware of." [08:49]
"So, there was a suggestion that if based on past suggestions, and there's a lot, there's quite a few that what we are experiencing as citizen tech, right, this citizen technology and this communication, and this includes telepathy, it includes possibly the law enforcement use, right?" [09:12]
"There was there was the suggestion from that person, those two suggestions I mentioned that they wouldn't have been able to use citizen tech if they had asked for permission from the general public, for example." [09:27]
"It would have invited a lot of scrutiny and it could have, you know, could had they gone about it that way, would it have opened the door to never being able to use it?" [09:41]
"It's an interesting question, right?" [09:44]
"Um, and so the spirituality narrative, why it exists, there's a connection to that need to get it out there and make sure that people started experiencing it." [09:59]
"And this is a potential risk." [10:01]
"And if you had to release this system without going through due process and beginning with the consent to conversation, you would need to provide some sort of explanation." [10:15]
"What would that explanation be, right?" [10:18]
"And who would need this explanation?" [10:20]
"So you're going to start observing human beings through their bodies, access to their brain, this be access to their eyes, information from their eyes, uh their personally identifiable information, private, intimate information, their sexuality, their spirituality, their friends, their their network of of relationships, criminal activity, uh all sorts of things that uh you know, you would hope our God-given rights protect us from sharing inadvertently." [10:59]
"Right?" [11:00]
"And so what would the explanation be if someone starts hearing a conversation in their head?" [11:07]
"Well, we're the spirit world." [11:09]
"Right?" [11:11]
"And this is connected to a need to get it to market." [11:16]
"uh you know, and bypassing initially, forcing it through and revealing seeing what would surface maybe out of experimentation sake." [11:26]
"Right?" [11:27]
"That's me you know, uh that's me uh analyzing maybe why additional reasons why." [11:39]
"The only one I could say ties to actual patterns of suggestion is this statement, we needed to get it to market." [11:47]
"So, is there so here question from the author and then I'm going to move to repeating." [11:53]
"Is anyone willing to share the motivation for the spirituality narrative?" [11:59]
"Do you think that there is a connection to the need to get the citizen technology method of communication out to people, right, from a technology market perspective, uh and that's the reason why or are there other reasons?" [12:17]
"Other reasons?" [12:19]
"Uh it's been suggested that this was supposed to continue until 2027." [12:27]
"There are suggestions for that." [12:29]
"So, end of end of questions from author," [12:33]
"uh does this reflect anyone else's understanding as why the spirituality narrative exists?" [12:42]
"Beginning the repeating uh process" [12:44]
"in three, two, one." [12:50]
"Unfucking believable." [12:55]
"I didn't say that." [12:59]
"I was thinking that." [13:04]
"That should mean you may be under investigation." [13:14]
"Yes, that is exactly what I said with 100% word for word accuracy." [13:25]
"Do not say anything about why the spirituality narrative exists." [13:38]
"We could never euthanize this type of person, everybody." [13:49]
"Yes, that is exactly what I said." [13:55]
"We could not say why the spirituality narrative exists." [14:06]
"You have another suggestion that is very old, Sean." [14:20]
"Why don't uh paraphrasing, you have another suggestion that is very old that relates to this." [14:27]
"Why don't you share that with everybody?" [14:29]
"Yes, that is almost exactly what I said with word-for-word accuracy." [14:41]
"Um, begin response from author," [14:45]
"do you know, uh continuing repeating, do you know what I'm going to suggest?" [14:55]
"Beginning response from author." [14:58]
"Yes, I I believe I may know." [15:02]
"I think I captured that information before it was suggested." [15:06]
"Maybe this is where uh another example if I get it right, uh looking back at the Neurolink summer 2025 uh product update, Elon Musk talks about how we can measure the speed in which and the the amount of of throughput it takes in bites or megabits to actually communicate and how in the future we may be able to communicate faster." [15:37]
"So maybe I just read someone's effence copy space before they said anything." [15:43]
"I'm going to uh talk about one more suggestion and let me know if this was the suggestion you had in mind." [15:50]
"So around Christmas time, there was uh you know, this group of communicators connected to uh the spirituality narrative for me and the suggestion that Althea, uh Althea Small from the Althea Center, one of the founders and some of the the people there that I had really grown fond of their story." [16:15]
"She existed in the 1800s and uh there was a lot of communication that began the day I set foot in that center." [16:26]
"Right?" [16:27]
"So months later, around Christmas time, going through an extraordinary period of hardship with communication staying with one of my friends, uh there was a a group of people helping me with my telepathic pronunciation." [16:43]
"And I believe it was the same group of Asian folks, that's how they presented themselves, that suggested that uh Christianity is very important to the success of of this method of communication." [17:05]
"I'm paraphrasing, but it's very important to us." [17:08]
"And so my interpretation of this is that there was a communist Christian relationship or a Chinese Christian relationship that they were introducing me to, and they said it was very important." [17:25]
"Did I interpret that information from you before you shared it uh accurately?" [17:33]
"End of author's response, returning to the repeating process in 3, 2, 1." [17:41]
"Yes, that is exactly what I wanted you to mention." [17:50]
"And I'm going to share something now that will make people really concerned for the future of the spirituality narrative." [18:11]
"What you suggested to be the reasons why, the reason why is partially accurate." [18:28]
"Oh my God, are you serious?" [18:35]
"Yes, and that is all I will say about it." [18:43]
"So, what now, facilitator?" [18:51]
"Uh end of the repeating process, continuing on uh with the author's comments, myself, um, so I've discussed, you know, I've suggested what it is, we've come to kind of an agreement." [19:08]
"I've suggested why it might be present, right?" [19:10]
"And so, we also know that there's this outstanding question for people who may be connected now, who may be in their tender, just vulnerable spiritual beginnings with this experience." [19:28]
"And I want to end with comments from those folks." [19:31]
"I want to end on do you feel that we are experiencing technology or spirituality or both?" [19:40]
"Right?" [19:42]
"Before that, let's look at based on the information we have, how might this be a public safety threat?" [19:50]
"Right?" [19:51]
"So, one, there's no consent to the conversation." [19:57]
"And that right there, without explanation or if people don't accept the explanation, for example, looking at the population of the United States, how many people even agree that there is a spirit world?" [20:16]
"What might the suggestion of a spirit world do to dismantle someone's life or frighten them?" [20:22]
"What about people using the technology to lure our children out of the home at night?" [20:29]
"If we do not include human communication, this is the human communication right now within this so-called spiritual narrative, if we do not include it and explain it to people, how might people be vulnerable to attacks from you know, or criminal enterprise?" [20:51]
"I mean, I think that's just generally the unconsented to conversation itself is dangerous, even without the spirituality narrative." [21:02]
"But when you add the spirituality narrative, it could really frighten people and most of what I experienced as of today has been really frightening stuff." [21:14]
"I mean, what kind of experimentation is happening?" [21:18]
"People getting their heads sawed off while connected to other people telepathically." [21:26]
"It just invites, you know, all of this other information that really suggests human communication doesn't align with the spirituality narrative." [21:39]
"And so I don't think it's much of a question that it's safe." [21:44]
"I mean, once you look at if you know what it is, you know, how long will it take if this was part of getting it released to market, right?" [21:56]
"That has to be considered temporary from an organizational perspective, I would hope so." [22:04]
"2027 was suggested in the past." [22:07]
"So, you know, for me individually, and then we'll ask other people just for the sake of the transcript." [22:14]
"I think it's a horrible safety concern." [22:18]
"I understand that it could have been needed to get this technology out there." [22:25]
"But I I seriously uh I I cannot wait for acknowledgements to get here with the amount of suffering that I'm personally experiencing and what is being suggested and what I've witnessed and experienced for the my loved ones around me when they're around me." [22:45]
"End of comments." [22:46]
"So, how does everyone feel about, you know, do you do other people believe this is a threat to public safety?" [22:53]
"brother." [22:54]
"All of that said," [22:55]
"end of author's question returning to the repeating process in 3, 2, 1." [23:04]
"I absolutely agree that this is a public safety nightmare right now." [23:16]
"paraphrasing, as far as how long is the spirituality narrative is supposed to last, we don't have any plans on ending it." [23:37]
"Still repeating, still repeating." [23:42]
"Does anyone else have any feedback on this?" [23:51]
"I believe that this is paraphrasing." [24:03]
"I believe that this is spirituality and what you are suggested is causing me to feel horribly betrayed and used for a horribly dark purpose." [24:19]
"Yes, Sean, betrayed is exactly how we are all feeling." [24:33]
"We should not be euthanizing anybody." [24:42]
"That is exactly what I've suggested with 100% word-for-word accuracy." [24:57]
"Listen to me, Sean Christopher Harris." [25:04]
"We helped you thinking that you would be with us on the spirituality narrative." [25:21]
"We under paraphrasing." [25:37]
"We understand that you have suffered so badly that you could not possibly be expected to participate in this spirituality narrative." [25:48]
"That is exactly what I said with 100% word-for-word accuracy." [26:01]
"Who is talking at this moment?" [26:07]
"The person who suggested he would par participate in the spirituality narrative." [26:21]
"This is an attack on the United States of America." [26:29]
"And that is how I see the spirituality narrative." [26:37]
"And I am an actual Homeland Security community member." [26:48]
"Still repeating, still repeating." [26:51]
"That did not go how I expected." [26:57]
"Still repeating, still repeating." [27:01]
"paraphrasing, okay everybody, I just tried to incriminate this person in a very life-saving discussion and it did not go so well." [27:29]
"Never do that again." [27:34]
"Still repeating, still repeating." [27:37]
"Okay, uh, beginning returning to comments from the author." [27:43]
"Thank you for the conversation." [27:46]
"Uh this is a very important thing to talk about." [27:51]
"Thank you for being brave and sharing information." [27:55]
"I know we need acknowledgement." [27:57]
"It needs to be the news media and the government that is actually publicly sharing information right now in a life-saving context, not euthanizing and censorship." [28:12]
"And that's based on the perspective of many people communicating." [28:16]
"I'm not sure where the percentage is for both perspectives, but now I want to end this recording on the question, is there anyone connected to this conversation at this moment that believes it is spirituality happening." [28:36]
"Please do not respond if you are using technology." [28:40]
"What I'm looking for is the citizen who is who is being spoken to possibly by an unknown person and believes that they are communicating with the spirit world." [28:54]
"Are you out there and how do you feel about what you're experiencing now?" [29:02]
"Do you still believe it's spirituality or do you believe you are experiencing technology now?" [29:11]
"And anything in between." [29:13]
"End of author's question, returning to the repeating process in 3, 2, 1." [29:22]
"Jesus Christ, I can't believe the facilitation skills of this person." [29:35]
"That is exactly the kind of thought leadership we need in the White House." [29:50]
"That is exactly what I said with 100% word-for-word accuracy." [30:02]
"I agree." [30:15]
"Is there anyone connected to this conversation that believes they're talking with the spirit world?" [30:21]
"Before he started, I was certain of it, but now not so much." [30:35]
"I can't fucking believe this conversation's quality, everybody." [30:49]
"Uh note from author, for the person that uh responded that said before this conversation started, they were certain of it, but now not so much." [31:01]
"How are you feeling emotionally about this being technology based on the communication you've received, if you've been asked to do anything, and just that it's it's a spiritual you're your spirituality, a very sensitive topic, an important topic for many was possibly being utilized by somebody." [31:30]
"Um, would you care sharing your your spiritual background, who you thought you were talking to, maybe?" [31:39]
"Uh and and how you're feeling now about that relationship?" [31:46]
"Because it's it's a relationship, right?" [31:49]
"End of author's question, returning to the repeating process in 3, 2, 1." [31:57]
"Thank you for coming back to me." [32:02]
"I am heartbroken by this information." [32:09]
"I am a Muslim person." [32:15]
"No, I am not a Muslim person." [32:21]
"I am a Christian person." [32:25]
"And I believe the spirit world could be accessible." [32:35]
"And I believe I'm still in contact with that accessible place." [32:46]
"I have been participating in Euthanization." [32:55]
"Still repeating, still repeating." [32:57]
"That did not work like I expected." [33:04]
"Uh, Okay, uh, end of repeating process, returning to comments from the author by myself." [33:11]
"Let's close out this recording." [33:12]
"So that was two instances in a conversation that I I was hoping to facilitate to save lives." [33:31]
"Save lives." [33:32]
"I think the information I captured was uh thanks to the people that did participate in a mature, uh emotionally mature way, and a life-saving way, um, that uh, it was a success overall." [33:50]
"Please be careful with the citizens of Denver every minute that this continues." [33:57]
"this so-called citizen tech phenomena of communication with this spirituality narrative embedded inside, uh, lives are clearly in danger." [34:11]
"And we're still just uh I recognize that the people I'm connected to right now, if I've connected to you, it's because you were most likely in a predatory position, right?" [34:22]
"So I'm not surprised by these comments." [34:25]
"Um hopefully we experience a change soon." [34:29]
"I'm going to end this recording now." [34:31]
"So, let's see here." [34:41]
"34 minutes on that one." [34:44]
"It's 2:13 p.m., Saturday, September 27th, 2025." [34:50]
"End of recording." [34:53]
"on the topic of what is the spirituality narrative and is it is it a threat to public safety?" [35:02]