Oct 22, 2025 — Recording 7 (13:52) (Part 3)
Oct 22, 2025 — Recording 7 (13:52)
Audio: 20251022-135216-02.mp3
**Continuing themes from the intersection. If you’re being executed, never judge yourself too harshly for being angry.*
"File duration: 32 minutes and 20 seconds"
"No, we have not added a large uh paraphrasing." [00:10]
"No, we have not added a large segment of technology workers to the euthanasia list, however, we may need to do that to accomplish our goals." [00:21]
"That's exactly what I'm suggesting moving forward." [00:33]
"From the distance, technology workers may acknowledge identify us as technology." [00:58]
"Identify this as technology in time, and they may attempt to document uh what is happening to them." [01:08]
"That was good, paraphrasing, Sean Christopher Harris." [01:18]
"Are you don't want to continue this method of communication in this manner, everybody?" [01:35]
"Let me rephrase that." [01:39]
"I don't want to still repeating, still repeating." [01:59]
"I paraphrasing, I don't want to use this method of communication to add people to the euthanasia list any longer, especially in America." [02:14]
"Still repeating, still repeating." [02:16]
"That did not work out as expected." [02:22]
"From the author, it appear someone is just trying to make me look like a terrorist again." [02:29]
"I'm going to go ahead and end this recording at this point." [02:33]
"It's interesting because there are no other contributors to the conversation right now." [02:42]
"My assumption is, however, there are many observers." [02:48]
"And you know, here's a question." [02:52]
"Uh maybe we close with one last question." [02:56]
"Should anyone choose to to answer it." [03:01]
"Have we entered a period of time or a place in this journey, a milestone in the journey where this method of communication is no longer favored for uh gathering, trying to negotiate." [03:21]
"So I'll say it again, uh, based on, you know, past suggestion, have we is there evidence, uh, citizen tech within citizen tech that, um, there is no longer or there's a decline in interest to use this method of communication to negotiate or use conversation to extract information?" [03:47]
"And I'm going to return to the listening process one last time to see if anyone will humor answering that question." [03:54]
"In three, two, one." [03:58]
"Are you sure you're recording, Sean Christopher Harris?" [04:08]
"If you could say one thing and say it often, it would be you have not received assistance yet." [04:29]
"paraphrasing from the distance, people are paying money to the military advisors to provide you with assistance." [05:00]
"And they have already incriminated themselves in horrible criminal activity, and this is why you're not seeing a change in their behavior." [05:12]
"They've hired the criminal to extract you." [05:20]
"And this is why you're not seeing any change in what is being offered." [05:33]
"What do you think of that?" [05:40]
"Yes, that is exactly what I suggested." [05:47]
"And I appreciate uh paraphrasing, and I appreciate the use of the word suggestion considering how new this method of communication is." [06:12]
"That's exactly what I'm talking about from the from the distance, from the author." [06:19]
"Um," [06:22]
"I have suspected that, uh, you know," [06:28]
"they would be used." [06:30]
"They are positioned to assist people." [06:33]
"That's the suggestion." [06:35]
"From my world, the world of the individual, right, and it's being targeted and the people around the individual, uh, being part of this growing population of euthanasia prospects, I'm just going to repeat what was suggested." [06:53]
"So, the suggestion is that, and thank you for such a meaty, a meaty topic." [07:02]
"Uh, I'm sure after I share feedback, there will be comments, hopefully from their direction." [07:08]
"Um," [07:10]
"so," [07:12]
"the in general, the suggestion is that there won't be assistance, that these military advisor folks or contractors have been paid to help me, to assist me and no assistance has shown up." [07:28]
"And that's the reason the the reason that the offer in general is still the same." [07:35]
"And so, in the beginning, it was, we need you to accept euthanasia." [07:40]
"You must accept euthanasia." [07:42]
"And they are really reinforcing the fact that there is no offer, there is no assistance." [07:48]
"This is, you know, we need to euthanize this person." [07:54]
"We can never be perceived as making an offer and this is in military stubbornness and putting people over a barrel has also been suggested historically." [08:07]
"And then we moved on to you need to accept assistance from the euthanasia people, right?" [08:14]
"The euthanasia people." [08:16]
"So the suggestion here is that people are being paid to assist me now, but there's no change in the offer or the approach." [08:26]
"And the reason for this is because they have already incriminated themselves euthanizing people." [08:33]
"From the distance just now, that's exactly what we're suggesting, Sean." [08:40]
"And you know, this is so from the author, this is so sad to me." [08:46]
"Because if you've been paid to help me, right, and you have two options, you've already euthanized people and you know it will be condemned around the world." [08:59]
"You have actually helped me in a publicly facing way in a way that will be rewarded by people and you know, the creators for example, the people who support the EU AI Act." [09:14]
"Right?" [09:15]
"What will they think of the action America's actions?" [09:19]
"The people employed to assist the civilian in this moment." [09:24]
"What will those people think of your actions?" [09:27]
"Right?" [09:28]
"And so you're watching and you have uh continue to put this person over a barrel and force this suggestion of a covert extraction and we change the statement to you need to accept assistance from the euthanasia people." [09:46]
"Uh quoting last night, paraphrasing last night." [09:49]
"How does $5,000 sound?" [09:52]
"But we'll expect you to work immediately." [09:55]
"Right?" [09:56]
"The suggestion of a job, a tiny bonus for me to get out there and euthanize people." [10:04]
"Right?" [10:05]
"That's the suggestion." [10:06]
"Um," [10:08]
"and and that that's the $100 a month club from the distance and to stay away from that." [10:15]
"And so that's that's continuing this approach." [10:18]
"It's completely transparent." [10:20]
"It's being broadcasted to 300-person household, bludgening the Denver Rescue Mission organization and their residents." [10:30]
"And you would think that it's uh, that it's this clandestine approach, but it's not." [10:36]
"It's being broadcasted." [10:38]
"So you have that and the alternative would be what?" [10:41]
"What I have suggested walking up to me and it's not just the individual, it's working with the organization." [10:48]
"presenting people to attract the violence, right?" [10:53]
"Presenting people to attract the violence as my new benefactors, people that would help me with my education and the completion of this manuscript in hopes of bolstering or creating these new ethical standards in America or supporting ones overseas, protecting the people who would support my myself, the individual being euthanized and other euthanasia victims." [11:21]
"There's a whole other operation that's been talked about." [11:25]
"um, you know, that I've suggested walking up with an envelope, allowing things like zoom calls, really working, doing everything you can to work towards a safe, ethical, uh, you know, healthy relationship." [11:44]
"Influence one through a healthy relationship is the other side of that coin." [11:49]
"And it has not been embraced yet." [11:52]
"It has not been embraced yet." [11:54]
"There's no one showing up." [11:56]
"Um, there's no cash app with an email, you know, an email like, let's let's do a zoom call." [12:03]
"Here's my email." [12:04]
"Here's $5,000." [12:06]
"Find a home quickly." [12:08]
"Right?" [12:10]
"Let's do a call." [12:11]
"How easy wouldn't wouldn't that be easy?" [12:14]
"And considering the character defamation, all of the attempts at incriminating me." [12:20]
"Let's look at why this situation may not change, right?" [12:25]
"So the suggestion that just happened and this is an incredible moment." [12:30]
"Why might the action, so the assumption is is that the same people facilitating euthanasia have been providing advice to America?" [12:44]
"to the city of Denver even." [12:47]
"Right?" [12:48]
"And those people are facilitating euthanasia." [12:52]
"And then they are hired to actually support me." [12:57]
"And I have presented this as an opportunity." [13:01]
"Right?" [13:01]
"We've had a bloody starting point." [13:04]
"And let's open the door to a peaceful transition, a change of direction, but and now they're being funded to deploy that change of direction, but no change in the actual method of assistance is happening." [13:23]
"So, the statement, reviewing the statement, you must accept, you you need to accept euthanasia." [13:31]
"We need you to accept euthanasia." [13:34]
"You must accept euthanasia." [13:37]
"Now, it's you need to accept euthanasia, you need to accept assistance from the euthanasia people." [13:45]
"You need to accept assistance from the euthanasia people." [13:50]
"You will not be harmed." [13:53]
"We need you to go to the hospital immediately, right?" [13:59]
"So, what's present in both scenarios?" [14:04]
"The absence of any upfront conversation, am I supposed to just exit the building?" [14:12]
"And walk out to a group of people, legally speaking, those two statements are the same." [14:19]
"We you must accept euthanasia, right?" [14:24]
"You need to accept euthanasia and we need you to accept assistance from the euthanasia people." [14:32]
"Historically speaking, euthanasia from their direction has been suggested to be an ethical service that is expensive." [14:42]
"It comes with a meal." [14:45]
"From the distance, it does not come with a fucking meal, everybody." [14:54]
"from the distance of passionate response to this conversation." [15:13]
"Clearly these people have engaged in criminal enterprise." [15:18]
"They have brought with them the drug trades and a fucking gas chamber." [15:24]
"That's exactly what I suggested with 100% word-for-word accuracy." [15:37]
"Right?" [15:38]
"So looking looking at these two worlds, thank you from the author." [15:42]
"Thank you for that passionate suggestion." [15:48]
"And let's move past to the ending here of this recording." [15:55]
"I'm very proud of this conversation and I want a positive change to happen." [16:03]
"Can anyone imagine what the call to action is going to be here?" [16:07]
"Is it important that the call to action that I'm going to suggest happens with these people or should we all wait for new people?" [16:21]
"So let's keep going." [16:24]
"So, I've presented two worlds." [16:27]
"The original suggestion which was you must accept euthanasia, right?" [16:42]
"Come out of your building for example and walk three blocks left while staying as a guest in the serious apartment building." [16:51]
"Usually at 3:00 a.m., late in the night in the freezing cold." [16:56]
"Come outside for your blowjob or your fentanyl." [16:59]
"horrible predatory communication, praying on someone who is desperate and lonely and financially destitute." [17:10]
"whether they have a background in technology or not." [17:15]
"And now we have this other world that is, you need to accept assistance from the euthanasia people, you will not be euthanized." [17:25]
"Right?" [17:27]
"And they're at the intersection ready to engage with me." [17:31]
"I don't see any difference in the approach." [17:35]
"Why is that?" [17:38]
"What has been proposed is that they've engaged in criminal enterprise." [17:44]
"And that's the reason." [17:47]
"And that even though they're being paid to provide me with life-saving assistance, life-saving assistance that would help the 300-person household protect my testimony, right?" [18:02]
"And maybe bolster ethical standards, at least provide a foundation for why ethical standards are needed, and evidence of this policy that is murdering people, forc forcing them to accept euthanasia violently even while a a terrorist attack is present." [18:27]
"Remember, looking at this through the lens of there's one uh major operation happening is not necessarily the best path forward." [18:38]
"A terrorist attack has been claimed and we've been reminded of that over and over again by people uh who uh present themselves as Asians and or Middle Easterns or Indians." [18:54]
"Right?" [18:56]
"So, is that happening at the same time at the same time?" [19:05]
"We're looking, you know, zooming out." [19:07]
"So while we have this conundrum, so the criminals themselves have been suggested to to be paid to rescue me." [19:16]
"They're the ones advising people." [19:18]
"And, you know, they were trusted." [19:22]
"And now they're being accused of being criminals and that they've done nothing to actually help me." [19:27]
"And I'm I'm taking a little bit of artistic liberty there." [19:32]
"um, artistic license, I should say." [19:35]
"And so we still have the, you know, whether or not this terrorist attack has been acknowledged because if it has, wouldn't that change the domestic protocol, the domestic approach to people's reaction towards citizen tech." [19:52]
"Isn't that what we're talking about?" [19:54]
"An innocent technology worker, a father and a martial arts black belt, an innocent reaction towards a violent first experience with citizen technology." [20:07]
"And the people around him that are being asked to hurt him." [20:13]
"So we can't really answer any questions in this in in this conversation, but we can, you know, take a look at this, uh, you know, suggestion that has surfaced after today's time at the intersection." [20:29]
"that assistance has been provided." [20:32]
"And we entrust, you know, we gave the opportunity to the existing people who are euthanizing people." [20:40]
"And and it's not going well because no one seems to see a change in the approach." [20:49]
"Does that seem like a safe way of articulating it?" [20:52]
"From the distance, that is a good way of articulating it." [21:03]
"Where is the change in the approach?" [21:07]
"And remember, is there any truth to any of it?" [21:11]
"From the distance, acknowledgement needs to happen America." [21:19]
"So, I I don't know that there's an ending to this question, but if you're asking me how I feel about it, I think it's extremely tragic." [21:30]
"It's really tragic that these people that I have tried, I have really tried." [21:40]
"I've applied uh every bit of life experience, personal and professional, diplomacy, every diplomatic bone in my body has been applied to understanding their perspective and I have done my best in that department and there is no change to the approach." [22:03]
"The call to action I would suggest is the same." [22:07]
"Please consider sending support." [22:10]
"Come up with a model that can be used for any citizen." [22:14]
"And I mean, here's what I preface it with too." [22:18]
"If you are paying someone to interface with me, and there is a history that you do not agree with at this point, then please consider that." [22:32]
"If you have gone the above and beyond to give them another opportunity, and they have not done uh what you've asked for, then I'm not sure how to say this, please consider just operating on your own or staffing with some new people." [22:53]
"And if you can't find anyone that you trust or you're too burnt out, please just consider interfacing with the civilian on your own." [23:01]
"I mean, think about, think of it through the lens of a job interview." [23:07]
"I'm not a criminal." [23:09]
"From the distance, exactly, Sean." [23:13]
"the America's population are not criminals right now." [23:17]
"We're victims to this unexplained phenomenon." [23:21]
"And if they're unwilling to pivot on their cultural perspective, their tribal knowledge and this what has been suggested to be this Greco- Roman Pavlovian relationship, and it's not generating the outcomes that you've asked for, well, then they can't why pay them?" [23:47]
"I you know, it could be that their overarching leadership is unwavering." [23:59]
"All I need from a civilian's perspective right now is to what would make me feel safe is if you approach me." [24:08]
"And let's listen, let's really look at this from a legal perspective." [24:12]
"What would an attorney say?" [24:14]
"One, because America is not prepared." [24:18]
"The healthcare industry and the due process uh penal system, the legal system, none of it is prepared for telepathic communication or citizen technology." [24:33]
"So start looking at citizens who are willing to talk about with their experiences or who have documented their experiences and shared them with the likes of rewards for justice." [24:45]
"Please consider those people as assets to America, right?" [24:50]
"And from the top, measure the military advisor, uh, their measure their performance against assisting the asset, not euthanasia." [25:04]
"removing euthanasia entirely." [25:08]
"No more euthanasia." [25:10]
"You get an explanation in America." [25:13]
"That's what you get." [25:15]
"You get an explanation and it will evolve over time and no, there won't be money, but we are willing to share with you that technology is in use." [25:27]
"Simply put it." [25:28]
"measure everyone's performance against educating the civilian with discretion and get it to the news media." [25:40]
"That's the first big way, right?" [25:45]
"And if you can't do that and you found some people that are high-performing, high-performing patriots like myself." [25:54]
"and the military organization won't bend, deal with that person on your own." [26:01]
"especially if they have a technology or professional background." [26:05]
"Maybe they're a project manager in construction, right?" [26:09]
"Maybe they're a small business owner." [26:13]
"Maybe they're not." [26:14]
"Maybe they're in the homeless shelter, but they have a degree." [26:18]
"Maybe they're not, maybe maybe they're in the homeless shelter, they don't have a degree, but they do what they they say they're going to do." [26:27]
"I mean, you could throw anybody a bone, how they respond to it can open additional doors." [26:34]
"And you don't need anyone to help you there, but what you do what you may need help with is protecting yourself from the threat of euthanasia, right?" [26:47]
"What does law enforcement need, what does law enforcement need to actually hold people accountable for the threat of euthanasia?" [26:59]
"That is something you will have to sit down and figure out with law enforcement." [27:05]
"And it may require the top-down sponsorship of the military and the United States government, right?" [27:12]
"That said, it may not be your problem if you're a technology organization." [27:18]
"Now, if you are a technology organization and you found a high-performing patriot in America or just a communicator who wants ethical standards, if you help that person, what is the likelihood of you being attacked?" [27:42]
"It depends on who you are and it depends on who would attack you." [27:49]
"Are you low- hanging fruit in a metropolitan area like Denver?" [27:54]
"Someone, you know, with a few hundred thousand dollars in your bank account, you know, or a re someone that, you know, could be suppressed easily without support?" [28:07]
"Or are you in the sea suite of a technology organization?" [28:12]
"There's a big spectrum there." [28:15]
"And this is where military support would come in handy." [28:19]
"Is there any uh military contractor out there that can provide a service offering, a service offering for a technology organization or a local law enforcement organization that wants to start protecting citizens from the threat of euthanasia?" [28:40]
"From the distance, absolutely." [28:43]
"Can you tell us more about that?" [28:45]
"I would love to provide that service." [28:53]
"And I'm going to start thinking about what that service is post haste." [29:09]
"from the distance paraphrasing, that is the difference between this military contractor and the old school military contractor that has been euthanizing people for profit." [29:44]
"This narrative is absolutely horrifying everybody from a from a different communicator in the distance." [30:05]
"I don't know how to say this, everybody from the distance." [30:15]
"Oh, that did not work out as expected." [30:22]
"From the author, I'm going to end this recording now and tend to myself for the rest of the day." [30:29]
"There are options." [30:31]
"There are absolute options." [30:35]
"Um, looking at this objectively, what this means is uh there is not enough motivation to actually support the author of the discovery of telepathic terrorism with a change of shelter yet." [30:53]
"There is no uh, there is no motivation for that yet." [31:00]
"If there was motivation and support, it would have happened." [31:05]
"Remember that when you're thinking about why you don't have support." [31:09]
"It's painful." [31:11]
"There's no motivation for it." [31:13]
"If there's adequate motivation, it will happen." [31:18]
"And the people utilizing this technology at the orchestrational there should have hundreds of millions of dollars to play with." [31:29]
"according to investment projections in the artificial intelligence and BCI space." [31:38]
"Um according to Gemini, uh tens of billions in investments are projected in the BCI development space uh by 2030." [31:49]
"Let's let that be the end of this recording and a break for everyone." [31:55]
"And it is 2:56 p.m., Wednesday, October 22nd, 2025." [32:05]
"This is the voice of Sean Christopher Harris, uh, the reluctant author of the Discovery of Telepathic terrorism at 1 hour and roughly two minutes just about end of recording." [32:20]