Nov 13, 2025 — Recording 6 (15:51) (Part 4)
Nov 13, 2025 — Recording 6 (15:51)
Audio: 20251113-155159.mp3 · Duration 26:56
**3:52pm, How might a household defend themselves from the threat of the so-called euthanization “ugly workflows”?takeaways from the intersection including a response to the suggestion of (paraphrasing) “I’m with Netflix believe it or not. I need access to this person without destroying my friends and family circle.”*
"It's 3:52 p.m. Thursday, November 13th, 2025." [00:06]
"This is the voice of Sean Christopher Harris exiting the intersection today." [00:13]
"I'm going to touch on the themes briefly and then uh someone's just asked a very important, made a very important suggestion." [00:23]
"um, paraphrasing, I need access to this person without destroying my friends and family circle." [00:31]
"I'm with Netflix, believe it or not." [00:37]
"Are you serious?" [00:42]
"Yes, I am dead serious." [00:47]
"I need access to this person for the purpose of telling this story as soon as humanly possible." [01:02]
"And I am deeply concerned for what that could do to my friends and family circle." [01:14]
"would do is what I suggested." [01:20]
"I'm catching up quickly." [01:23]
"From the author, I've got I could uh share some information on how a household might protect themselves." [01:32]
"without acknowledgement." [01:34]
"uh, from the, you know, publicly facing kind of news media that someone would expect right now." [01:42]
"I want you to return, thank you for your suggestion." [01:45]
"I'm going to return I wonder if there's any truth to that." [01:49]
"I'm going to return to uh capturing the themes from the intersection now." [01:54]
"and uh wrapping up," [01:58]
"wrapping up today's research." [02:01]
"So, let's continue on so the at the intersection of eighth and Colorado," [02:07]
"the unconsented to communication with the vehicles continues," [02:12]
"the violent communication, people being uh communicated with and on their response added to the uthanization list." [02:21]
"Um, for a sixth day in a row," [02:25]
"fifth or sixth now, I believe it's the sixth day in the row." [02:29]
"Uh this additional statement is being spoken to the vehicles." [02:33]
"So in addition to do not support this person with the sign or do not support this person to the left of you." [02:43]
"Uh my sign read" [02:44]
"Google the Battle for your brain, right?" [02:49]
"And the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act, anything helps." [02:56]
"And so the battle for your brain is Anita Fehani." [02:59]
"Uh, Anita Fehani's book on artificial intelligence and its access to your brain." [03:07]
"She's a Duke law professor, specializing in artificial intelligence and thought leader in the neuroethics space." [03:15]
"um and the artificial intelligence space." [03:20]
"Uh so this this statement in addition to do not support this person to the left of you." [03:28]
"Do not support this person with the sign an attempt to suppress me financially." [03:34]
"And also a way of spreading uh youth euthanasia prospects, covert euthanasia prospects." [03:42]
"People were suggested for a sixth day in a row, do not Google that information." [03:49]
"which, you know, is just a blatant censorship." [03:54]
"in this unconsented to delivery." [03:58]
"And uh people responded whether they read the sign and you could continue to hear their thoughts out loud." [04:05]
"uh paraphrasing, battle for your brain." [04:10]
"Is that what we're going through?" [04:12]
"Right?" [04:14]
"Add that person to the euthanasia list." [04:18]
"This continued on uh for a couple hours." [04:23]
"And for a second day in a row, we had more than one group demonstrate overrides." [04:32]
"I didn't actually do any overrides today because" [04:35]
"these two groups conducted overrides for conservatively a half hour to 45 minutes." [04:43]
"total." [04:46]
"And they were effective." [04:49]
"They were just as effective as any override I have conducted." [04:54]
"Remember, overrides are the individual or the citizen's ability to control the conversation, to use the mental exertion" [05:05]
"that comes with the unconsented to life threatening conversation and change it in real time into a an active defense of the vehicle." [05:19]
"For example, I do not support this person to the left of you becomes, do not support a word we say." [05:28]
"Do not Google this information becomes, don't forget to Google this information." [05:36]
"They're driving by and thinking about the sign reading it." [05:40]
"It's been months now" [05:44]
"of going through this and uh it's so important to hold space for an explanation." [05:51]
"You're not going to have one, a formal one right now, but you must acknowledge the method of communication" [05:58]
"and uh label it as something." [06:01]
"The default way of doing this would be uh, you know, it's a spiritual experience." [06:08]
"That's just the default" [06:10]
"point of view that any human being would come up with, that's also being solicited and socialized as an explanation." [06:20]
"And unfortunately, that explanation doesn't allow for any movement or any control over the conversation." [06:27]
"Someone might apply prayer or some kind of spiritual practice and because it's technology," [06:36]
"It's not going to have the effect one would hope." [06:41]
"And it is a complete betrayal of the human being." [06:44]
"Isn't it?" [06:46]
"From the distance just now, unfucking believable." [06:52]
"It's also a pattern of suggestion that the people, some of the people facilitating the so-called euthanasia ugly workflows are firm believers in uh the the euthanasia being a service to the community, violence, covert violence." [07:12]
"Euthanasia." [07:14]
"Um, so, let's let's talk about this suggestion that was mentioned when I began the recording." [07:25]
"Uh paraphrasing, I need access to this person without uh inviting the destruction of my this problem to my friends and family circle." [07:38]
"Um, so whether or not there's any truth to that, I may never know, please use email uh or telephone." [07:49]
"I think one of the hard truths about this situation is that the technology in use brings transparency." [07:58]
"brings transparency that did not normally exist." [08:02]
"And so is it is it just this futile endeavor to only use this method of communication thinking that you have a covert status while you're using it?" [08:14]
"I think you're you're in the same exact position as you would be if you used your email" [08:21]
"or your phone." [08:22]
"I I don't know that I could really suggest there's any difference." [08:27]
"The suggestion is if you look in my direction, uh you're going to be observed." [08:32]
"And um," [08:34]
"And that our eyes are in use." [08:37]
"information from our eyes, the POV human experience including physical sensation, vision, visual information from our site." [08:48]
"uh auditory information, your information from your ears," [08:54]
"taste, it's all it's all provided by a brain-to-brain connection." [09:03]
"Right?" [09:04]
"That has not yet been explained yet." [09:06]
"And so what can a household do if the household and if an individual in the house becomes targeted?" [09:16]
"What can they do?" [09:18]
"Well, the short answer is is I would suggest transparency." [09:22]
"So if one person in the home uh or your network is being communicated with, make sure that everyone aligns on what is happening to them and everybody in the house has a rule that we're going to talk about what's happening." [09:38]
"And we're going to come up with an early definition, an initial definition of how this works and why it's happening, right?" [09:47]
"A shared understanding." [09:48]
"that we're being spoken to by a predatory communicator, groups of people who are predatory in their communication." [09:57]
"The first thing you need to do is remove the curtain from these people, right?" [10:04]
"Rip the curtain right off the the rod." [10:06]
"And uh, part of that is explaining and aligning as a household on what the belief is." [10:12]
"And so ideally you have an alignment there." [10:15]
"If one person does not agree, well, it may invite danger." [10:19]
"Right?" [10:22]
"So you decide that, hey, there's a terrorist attack of some kind." [10:26]
"An attack is happening and these people are attempting to euthanize our citizens." [10:32]
"And so they use words and imagery, synthetic media potentially," [10:38]
"and they attempt to isolate us and lure us out of the home." [10:43]
"And the rules moving forward are as follows." [10:46]
"We're all going to use a group chat or a Google Doc." [10:51]
"We're all going to capture transcripts if anything is being communicated, try and share it." [10:59]
"Upload a recording." [11:02]
"Right?" [11:02]
"For example, Sean comes to live with you and uh Sean, they're telling me that you're masturbating in the bathroom right now." [11:12]
"Um, are you masturbating?" [11:15]
"And I'd say, well, you know, no." [11:18]
"We have to agree to be transparent." [11:21]
"Sean, it's being suggested that you want to sleep with my wife and that I should help these people euthanize you." [11:28]
"I thought you should know." [11:30]
"Do you find my wife attractive?" [11:33]
"These are exactly the kind of ugly conversations, the ugly suggestions that would rip a home to pieces." [11:41]
"and end up getting someone hurt." [11:43]
"And so you have to have transparency in the home." [11:46]
"And I think this is the essential truth of the situation." [11:51]
"It shouldn't that be what a home is?" [11:54]
"I mean, technically, I don't know." [11:58]
"Really, if someone's having thoughts like this, has there ever been a time in history where something like this happened?" [12:04]
"I can't think of any and you're supposed to just really dismiss thoughts like this as rubbish," [12:12]
"as irrational thought, as paranoia." [12:16]
"But when they continue to surface and they continue to be forced on the household," [12:23]
"what can you do?" [12:25]
"you know?" [12:25]
"And so here's the question for the household that" [12:29]
"educates themselves and aligns on a direction and is honest with each other." [12:36]
"Right?" [12:37]
"Again, another one." [12:38]
"Uh, hey, son, I keep being told that you're going to poison us at dinner tonight." [12:44]
"Can you thought you should know." [12:47]
"And then I say, no, that that's not accurate." [12:52]
"I heard that one." [12:53]
"Do you still want to have dinner?" [12:55]
"Actually, no, we're run down." [12:58]
"We'd like to just spend time together alone." [13:01]
"Right?" [13:01]
"And and so it's a it's not just about sharing information, it's bringing your best self to the conversation and and not judging yourself," [13:13]
"overly judging yourselves" [13:16]
"and punishing yourselves or others" [13:19]
"for information that is really just, you know, these are all suggestions that are they're weapons." [13:27]
"It's not who we are." [13:29]
"And so a question might be after a household has gone through a period of time, right?" [13:35]
"Has established some guidelines and they're being transparent, how long before the enemy abandons the household?" [13:44]
"Right?" [13:46]
"And what would cause the situation to fail?" [13:49]
"Would anyone care to comment on this suggestion from the distance in three, two, one?" [13:58]
"From the distance just now, paraphrasing, what you're suggesting should be mandatory for every household right now." [14:14]
"Yes, that is exactly what I'm talking about." [14:21]
"Please continue for the author, please continue if there if there is more information, more thoughts from you or anyone." [14:30]
"I really appreciate what you've suggested." [14:38]
"If that is all the household needs to do, then why would we have done this to begin with?" [14:52]
"Yes, that is exactly what I've suggested." [15:00]
"Unfucking believable from the distance, still repeated, still repeating from the author." [15:09]
"Would anyone have any comments on how long uh it would take before, do you think this practice in the household," [15:20]
"I mean, and it could literally be a board game" [15:24]
"later on after this threat goes away." [15:27]
"It reminds me of just some gritty Cards against humanity game." [15:32]
"Like where you could uh," [15:35]
"I mean there's something here." [15:38]
"How might we flip this conversation to use someone else's uh terminology from about a week ago?" [15:46]
"How might we flip the script?" [15:48]
"I'll use that in this context now." [15:51]
"Any thoughts on how long it would take for a household to make it through this?" [15:56]
"What might happen to the household?" [15:59]
"You know, what's the likelihood of success?" [16:02]
"What kind of person would be needed to actually have success in this?" [16:08]
"Is it Do you think people could do it?" [16:11]
"How likely would you be to share this kind of information with a roommate hopes of saving their life or holding the home together?" [16:21]
"So many directions you could uh go in this conversation in three, two, one." [16:28]
"From the distance just now, paraphrasing, I don't think people could actually do it." [16:47]
"Uh, be transparent with each other." [16:50]
"They might convince themselves of that." [16:53]
"However, it really depends on the type of person." [17:04]
"If you were in a home with another couple," [17:14]
"I am almost if you were with a married couple in their household, I am almost 100% certain the marriage would be attacked in an effort to eject you from the household." [17:38]
"to suppress that support, paraphrasing now from the distance." [17:45]
"paraphrasing the last suggestion," [17:48]
"last suggestion from the distance." [17:51]
"This is an incredible recording everybody." [17:59]
"I want this person to fight his way to that assistance, and I want to learn what happens to those people." [18:19]
"paraphrasing a little bit of paraphrasing on the last statement." [18:22]
"Did I paraphrase that accurately?" [18:25]
"Yes, absolutely." [18:30]
"From the author, is there anything else about the intersection or this suggestion of what a family can do, a network of people can do to protect themselves?" [18:42]
"Did the person who made that suggestion originally that said they want access to this person without destroying their friends and family circle," [18:52]
"uh, does that person, what what do you did you already comment?" [18:57]
"What do you think about what I've suggested as a viable path forward for any household?" [19:03]
"From the distance just now, uh, paraphrasing, it is exactly what is needed of each household, but I am uncertain if I can uh if I can actually facilitate that level of the the level of transparency required" [19:42]
"due to just how predatory" [19:45]
"and gritty" [19:47]
"uh the the" [19:50]
"the communication is, the ugly workflow communication." [19:55]
"Did I paraphrase that accurately?" [19:57]
"Absolutely." [20:01]
"From I'm going to from the distance, I'm going to consider what you suggested followed immediately by, we don't have a choice everybody." [20:16]
"This is not optional." [20:20]
"From the author, I would agree with this and uh, you know, if the news media is not going to come forward and and they're still looking for information or being threatened themselves, what can someone do while we wait?" [20:38]
"And I think that is exactly the truth of it." [20:41]
"uh, look at the threat, what's standing in the way?" [20:44]
"Right now for me," [20:46]
"I don't have anyone that I feel comfortable trusting" [20:52]
"because of the contents of the conversation," [20:56]
"right?" [20:57]
"And this is my network." [20:59]
"right?" [20:59]
"I do not feel comfortable adding these people to the conversation." [21:03]
"However, if you are already communicating actively" [21:08]
"and you have some understanding of what's happening," [21:12]
"and you approach me and say, hey, we've been communicating" [21:16]
"and I can be a source of support for you." [21:19]
"And I'm interested in bringing the transparency you suggest." [21:24]
"Well, that is completely different." [21:26]
"I don't have to explain to that person" [21:28]
"what is happening." [21:31]
"Does that make sense?" [21:33]
"And it could be that that is the greatest opportunity presenting itself." [21:38]
"If you've been communicating," [21:40]
"you might not need the explanation someone else" [21:45]
"uh, someone else" [21:48]
"uh, would require." [21:50]
"Did I say that right?" [21:51]
"Yes." [21:52]
"Returning to the repeating process just to" [21:55]
"end this recording in the last few statements in three, two, one." [22:01]
"There is a unique opportunity uh being presented or presented if you've been communicating," [22:18]
"You're right." [22:20]
"It's because I wouldn't require an explanation like someone else." [22:29]
"How do you know that you could be actually communicated?" [22:36]
"From the author, if I've emailed you the document" [22:40]
"and you suggest that you've been involved in the conversation since receiving it," [22:46]
"uh, I would I would tend to give you the chance," [22:51]
"especially if you approach me in a way that is supportive." [22:56]
"And I would love to be there for someone." [22:59]
"Maybe this is how resistance to the actual attack begins." [23:05]
"because the people involved in communication reach out to each other." [23:11]
"They cross that line, this imaginary line that is just using email moving forward." [23:19]
"sending a donation and getting a zoom meeting going." [23:25]
"Returning to the repeating process," [23:28]
"uh, that was the last suggestions were from the author and now I'm moving to the repeating process for one last comment." [23:38]
"One last capture in three," [23:40]
"two," [23:42]
"one." [23:43]
"Are you going to consume alcohol?" [23:51]
"I may just drive up to you and offer you some assistance." [24:03]
"I am not going to do that today, however." [24:12]
"From the distance, that's the opposite of what he's suggesting." [24:19]
"And it makes you look so predatory from the distance." [24:28]
"From the author, I would tend to agree with that." [24:32]
"You're avoiding email, aren't you?" [24:36]
"But however, if you show up and you hand me information and tell me not to say anything," [24:45]
"Right?" [24:47]
"that you have information for me, do not say anything." [24:52]
"Here's my contact information." [24:54]
"For example, if my phone is suppressed so badly that no assistance can get through," [25:01]
"then that would be something." [25:04]
"You're sharing contact information." [25:07]
"Okay, we're never euthanizing this person is being suggested from the distance." [25:16]
"From the author, thank you for the defense in the conversation." [25:21]
"Thank you everyone for your service in the defense of the individual of the city of Denver." [25:28]
"Let's not let all this suffering be in vain." [25:34]
"Let's not the deaths that have been suggested be in vain for one more minute." [25:38]
"Can we please move forward?" [25:41]
"returning" [25:43]
"uh," [25:45]
"Actually, let's just end the recording at 4:17 p.m." [25:50]
"That was a recap on the intersection, uh from events at the intersection today, followed by suggestions or ideas on what a household can do to defend themselves and isn't it really being transparent just our duty to each other anyway?" [26:08]
"This is not optional right now." [26:10]
"when words are weaponized" [26:12]
"and murdering people." [26:14]
"The suggestion that people are being communicated with in such a violent and predatory way." [26:20]
"We must find transparency and and uh forgiveness for our own humanity." [26:26]
"unfortunately." [26:27]
"It could be the personal growth experience that that really helps somebody" [26:33]
"have peace in their life." [26:35]
" embarking on that journey." [26:36]
"I hope I find some people that will consider giving me a chance to do this with them." [26:43]
"End of recording at 26 minutes at 4:18 p.m." [26:50]
"Thursday, November 13th, 2025." [26:55]