Nov 19, 2025 — Recording 2 (11:22) (Part 4)
Nov 19, 2025 — Recording 2 (11:22)
Audio: 20251119-112203-02.mp3 · Duration 22:04
**Continuing capturing the “bowel movement research” external communications and suggestions on the so-called “breaching process”.*
"From the distance that coincides with our information." 00:04
"It involves penetrating the body, right, some of the physical sensation, uh, some of the experiences is stimuli like stimulating uh my backside while I sit on the toilet to trigger a bowel movement." 00:25
"There's also kind of um, what I would say is feels like something is being pointed at you." 00:31
"Uh, to support your body or or prompt uh movement in your bowels and at times it is not the most comfortable sensation, uh it feels similar to uh taking a laxative, that discomfort you have when you take a laxative." 00:52
"Um, in the past I think I've experienced someone who prompts these bowel movements as a form of terrorism." 01:02
"Uh, and so they go around asking for for this to happen to create an unfortunate experience." 01:12
"And and their behavior aligns with this suggestion, uh, we're submitting America, right, paraphrasing, this is about submitting America." 01:24
"You know, we will react based on how you react America." 01:31
"But then there is this other just really distinctly different experience that is the the lab coat." 01:42
"And so, you know, by including this in my document this could present uh, you know, scrutiny." 01:52
"Um, but it's it's the information. So what kind of a researcher would I be if I was going to pick and choose, pick and choose information." 02:06
"Does anyone want to speak to the to this question? Is digestive health research present? Uh, or is this something else?" 02:18
"Um, is uh, and also opinions on what does it mean for my documents to include uh this information." 02:32
"I'm ready if anyone wants to comment on the presence of bowel movement research in this so-called citizen tech experience." 02:43
"From the distance, I thought you were so burnt out Sean." 02:48
"From the author, I am uh very burnt out but this situation uh, uh I mean it involves many people." 03:03
"It involves many people and uh I would benefit from rest, I'm sure we all would." 03:11
"From the distance just now, yeah, exactly, I wish I could do something more for this individual situation." 03:29
"We can't offer help to any one person." 03:38
"From the distance, I really need to understand if bowel movement research is happening to America's citizens." 04:00
"Find a cigarette and consider updating the document." 04:14
"From the author, that is exactly what I'm going to do." 04:19
"No further comments from the bowel movement research people." 04:34
"There are no further comments from the bowel movement research people." 04:44
"From the author, whoever you are, the suggestion of bowel movement research is far more humane than uh being forced to accept euthanasia." 04:59
"So thank you for that." 05:04
"I hope one is completely separate from the other." 05:09
"Um, if not, then let's please consider using that information uh to bring a more humane approach. I think many things have have surfaced and..." 05:28
"that could be completely independent of of each other." 05:32
"From the distance, that's exactly how I think of it." 05:40
"I do have something I would like to ask this person." 05:51
"Are you ready for your assistance from the euthanization people?" 06:03
"From the author, do you accept your euthanization and do you, will you accept assistance from the euthanization people as it's the same term legally speaking is it not?" 06:19
"I'm not accepting euthanization." 06:30
"But uh, you know, I absolutely could use assistance. Just not euthanization." 06:38
"From the distance, okay Sean, then we have nothing for you then." 06:51
"From the distance another voice, okay Sean, this is really just never going to happen is it." 07:08
"We're removing you from the Monsanto list." 07:15
"Yes, that's exactly what I suggested." 07:21
"From the author, Monsanto hasn't been uh accused in a while." 07:29
"Welcome back." 07:38
"I doubt, I mean how many euthanization lists could there be?" 07:49
"Um, I'm going to end this recording but I want to say thanks for the people that have defended the conversation." 07:57
"And I understand how anyone, uh anyone defending this conversation will find it to be, do you find it to be one of the most unforgiving uh and selfless acts to defend people from uh this horrible use of citizen technology?" 08:20
"Yes, it's absolutely unforgiving from the distance." 08:27
"Yeah is what I suggested." 08:32
"Especially when you're having a bad day." 08:39
"I said especially when you're burnt out and you don't feel good about progress." 08:56
"From the author, yes. There is uh there is additional silence that has happened." 09:06
"And it was hard fought and uh I can't claim uh, you know I wouldn't want to, that that's my doing." 09:14
"Uh this has been, you know, there are people that have a full time job and or using automations defending the conversation from the threat of euthanasia or just predatory communication." 09:32
"And I'm grateful for that. It is progress." 09:36
"Um, but when I'm looking at what is required to get back to my life, uh there are a few things." 09:45
"One, I have lost my relationships with my friends and family circle over this." 09:50
"And those are priceless for personal reasons, it's... those are friendships, right?" 09:58
"Until there is acknowledgment I cannot go anywhere near someone who will not have respect for what is happening." 10:08
"And you know, you can't expect someone to want to acknowledge this method of communication." 10:15
"You can't expect them because to acknowledge it is to be seen as crazy." 10:23
"And so I think the one big milestone that would be required for someone, so I'll try and explain this, right?" 10:35
"If you if you go around someone who's going to do the bidding of the voice, your life is in danger." 10:43
"You can either live in a household that does the bidding, right? And maybe you're doing the bidding and you're facilitating euthanasia and you're working your way towards a terrorism charge, a prison sentence." 10:58
"I don't think this is going to be a permanent part of the future." 11:03
"I think it could last a little while longer, maybe even two more years, maybe until 2027." 11:11
"Um, but I I just don't see it continuing on, it's not sustainable." 11:18
"No, you can't you can't continue to execute people for communicating. That's not sustainable." 11:28
"Because I mean it's phenomena, it doesn't make any sense. The entire thing seems to be based on some esoteric folklore policy and not on an innovated workflow built on actual research." 11:44
"I mean, you know, legislation that... I just don't want to go down the road of explaining why it doesn't make sense." 11:53
"But it just doesn't seem sustainable from my personal opinion." 11:57
"And uh if you're around somebody that is going to do the bidding of this voice or is being pressured, is being threatened, then you're not going to be safe." 12:14
"Right? The greatest thing this terrorist act has going for it is the absence of acknowledgment." 12:22
"This is not a traditional hostage situation. No I'm not a detective or an analyst. I don't claim to be." 12:31
"Uh, but this is, you know, the one benefit this attack has over us all is the absence of acknowledgment." 12:39
"Because the minute the health care industry knows that this technology is in use, then everyone will have an explanation for this voice." 12:49
"I can go to a doctor, I can tell them that I've been singled out and I can get whatever resources that are available to someone being executed." 13:03
"And as far as the rest of the people go, they could all be instructed. Law enforcement could also let people know if you are doing the bidding of a stranger this is a federal offense. This is a federal crime." 13:18
"You are not allowed to take orders from a stranger." 13:23
"No, that's going to be seen as a a felony that will put you in prison for many years depending on what you're doing." 13:34
"And so then I could feel safe about going around somebody. Then my document looks like, well, ah here's evidence of this criminal enterprise, somebody being signaled out and executed." 13:49
"And right, this person was treated horribly and he deserves respect. What I'd get right now is I'm an inconvenience and I most likely will be executed." 14:02
"Uh, someone will be coerced or pressured into hurting me. And why is that? Because there's no explanation." 14:10
"There's no explanation and that's not just for me, that's for anyone who's been added to the euthanization list." 14:19
"How does everyone feel about this suggestion that the absence of acknowledgment is the uh is the great is the linchpin of this terrorist attack, the cornerstone of it?" 14:36
"And it means that the absence of acknowledgment supports the attack, right?" 14:41
"And the greatest thing we could do to remove this attack is acknowledge what is happening to people, the use of this technology to the health care industry." 14:50
"From the distance, I would agree with that." 14:56
"I would absolutely agree with that." 15:05
"From the distance just now, if you're supporting the covert use of this technology you are supporting the terrorist attack." 15:29
"You're supporting the terrorist attack." 15:32
"And it is a linchpin as you say." 15:36
"This is the reason things will never improve uh, from your perspective." 15:56
"Uh, from the author I think there are many things that could improve." 16:00
"Um, one is this idea that influence won through a healthy relationship is much more effective." 16:10
"Looking at the marketplace, marketplace research, the value of NPS scores, publicly facing organizations." 16:20
"And just influence won through positive experiences." 16:26
"If if the communication overall, right, if there was a way to take each of these independent uh agendas that have surfaced, these independent groups and align them on that one idea." 16:46
"Instead of controlling people, pressuring people using dog psychology, using Pavlovian uh a Pavlovian approach to the relationship, instead using modern relationship dynamics, modern self-development concepts." 17:02
"Right? That's an opportunity that could happen right now." 17:08
"And it means the removal of violent workflow." 17:13
"So you know, you won't have the benefit of uh NPS score or a publicly facing profile, right, that you're someone that talks to people, this is you have your people that you talk to." 17:29
"Paraphrasing, this is my person. Don't add my person to the euthanization list. Right?" 17:36
"So you have a a profile out there with your picture." 17:40
"And uh, you've got a five star review because your relationships are incredible." 17:47
"And that that review protects you from false accusations and it protects the the the person, the individual you're communicating with from predatory business practices that the worker has no control over." 18:05
"From the distance just now, that's exactly what I'd like to see happen regardless of acknowledgment." 18:17
"This is technology everybody. I can't believe the content of this conversation." 18:29
"Repeating from the distance, repeating from the distance, it's someone's technology." 18:40
"Un-fucking-believable. Does anybody else have anything they'd like to say before I shut down this recording?" 18:52
"So to summarize we talked about bowel movement research being suggested." 18:57
"I shared some of my experience in the esoteric beginnings where it was suggested that I received a medical treatment from a distance." 19:08
"And it was effective. We talked about the differences." 19:12
"You know the differences or value in the suggestion of uh digestive health research when compared to uh militarized, you know, workflow, weaponized communication." 19:30
"And then I felt it was more humane. And then we talked about uh, you know, the last thing we were looking at." 19:40
"The pre, you know, the value of uh influence won through a healthy relationship, change that could happen regardless of acknowledgment." 19:54
"And that not being able to acknowledge this to the general public, a health care industry that goes without uh evidence of the use of technology may be out there misdiagnosing people." 20:07
"And we have a resurgence now, the suggestion of an evil Kevorkian returning." 20:13
"This tribe of people forcing euthanization on us and telling us we're going to hell for communicating." 20:22
"And uh I'm sorry to use uh Kevorkian's name there. That that is not what is happening." 20:30
"He he was euthanizing people but I think his work was in the vein of helping someone who was suffering from cancer and that's not what this is." 20:43
"Um so, any closing comments before I end this recording? I'm exhausted and the quality of my work is suffering I believe." 20:58
"From the distance, not really." 21:04
"From the author, thank you for that." 21:08
"Just end the recording from the distance." 21:12
"From the author that is what I'm going to do at 12:02 at 40 minutes end of recording." 21:23
"Thank you for your service everyone." 21:26
"Regardless of where you're from we're going to earn this method of communication." 21:35
"Please consider this a starting point." 21:40
"A starting point and we're innovating whether we acknowledge it or not." 21:46
"This is an experiment that has outcomes." 21:49
"Let's acknowledge it and move forward quickly and nimbly." 21:57
"End of recording at 40 minutes." 22:02