Nov 19, 2025 — Recording 5 (15:43) (Part 4)
Nov 19, 2025 — Recording 5 (15:43)
Audio: 20251119-154304.mp3 · Duration 27:02
**3:43pm, capturing takeaways from the intersection including “I found their satellite. It’s used in seismic research”.*
"It's 3:43 PM, Wednesday, November 19th, 2025." (00:06)
"Um, this is the voice of Sean Christopher Harris, the author of The Discovery of Telepathic Terrorism." (00:14)
"Just exiting the intersection." (00:17)
"Total of four dollars in donations, uh, for what was two to three hours." (00:26)
"Um, so for the last few days, uh, just takeaways on the intersection, for the last few days, say almost a week now, uh, there's been a, an increased interest in learning to override the predatory communication with the vehicles." (00:46)
"Today someone even suggested, paraphrasing, 'I've literally been given access to funding, uh, because of overrides.'" (00:57)
"Um, 'I don't feel comfortable using this person and, and I've been given access to funding for overrides,' from the author, the suggestion that someone out there has benefitted in their, uh, from the information surfacing around me and, uh, myself and others in our journey through this, uh, so-called citizen technology phenomena." (01:30)
"Some of the milestones in that journey continue to reveal themselves as spiritual beginnings, followed by technological awareness." (01:41)
"Uh, adaptation might be a third milestone." (01:45)
"Um, for the last two days, recordings at the intersection were about double the length, uh, as usual, captured an hour." (01:55)
"Most of the recording was the overrides, uh, demonstrated by other people." (02:01)
"Uh, overrides on the threatening communication, for example, uh, the historical statement that really hasn't changed in a year with the exception of a recent addition, 'Do not support that person.'" (02:18)
"‘Do not support that person to the left of you or with the sign.’" (02:22)
"Uh, over the last few days, ‘Do not support that, that drug addict or that junkie with the sign,’ really angry, uh, and inaccurate." (02:34)
"Um, ‘Do not listen to a word that person says’ is also kind of a new variation." (02:41)
"Uh, the addition that I spoke of is this, is based on the use of a, a new message on the sign." (02:49)
"So, this is a six-lane thoroughfare, I stand in the median in the middle, three lanes on each side, and, uh, I hold a cardboard sign in hopes of finding donations." (03:04)
"The goal is silence at the intersection but these statements, uh, continue to bombard the vehicles, right?" (03:11)
"So the first one already suggested, ‘Do not support this person,’ in any variation, and now, this, the sign I'm using, ‘Google: The Battle for Your Brain.’" (03:24)
"Again, ‘Google: The Battle for Your Brain,’ Nita Farahany's book." (03:30)
"Uh, Duke University's professor of law and neuro-ethicist, uh, Nita Farahany's book on, um, artificial intelligence, or technology, neuro-tech's access to your brain." (03:47)
"Cognitive liberty, right?" (03:50)
"Um, and so now that I'm using that sign, for, spent about five days now, almost a week, this new statement has surfaced: ‘Do not Google that information.’" (04:03)
"And so the vehicles are being bombarded with two statements now: ‘Do not support that person with the sign’ and ‘Do not Google that information,’ which if you take it just at surface, at its surface, it just feels like Soviet censorship." (04:26)
"Communist censorship of information." (04:29)
"From the distance just now, ‘Fascist censorship,’ uh, is another way of looking at it, paraphrasing." (04:37)
"Um, from the distance, ‘Dope, that's exactly what I'm talking about.’" (04:44)
"Uh, from the author, there is another important theme." (04:50)
"We have, uh, a small emerging pattern: seismic." (05:00)
"Seismic research, satellite use, uh, seismic technology." (05:09)
"So, seismic, I did just a very little light research on this, seismic was mentioned, uh, after attempting to locate someone communicating or observing." (05:22)
"India was suggested and then the word seismic." (05:26)
"And so today, a second, for a second time now, this word, uh, seismic, paraphrasing, ‘I've located these people, I found their satellite, it's a dated, or it's an older satellite used in seismic research.’" (05:54)
"From the distance, ‘That's exactly what I suggested just now.’" (05:58)
"From the author, can you tell us more about this suggestion?" (06:06)
"‘That's all I can say right now.’" (06:11)
"‘I did not say that.’" (06:14)
"From the distance just now, response, ‘I work with,’ paraphrasing, ‘I work with the United States government, we're very proud of the information you've surfaced, hang in there, we're not ready to provide assistance yet.’" (06:55)
"‘Yes, that's exactly what I suggested from the distance.’" (07:02)
"From the author, well, I, I understand that observations will happen." (07:09)
"Um, if something happens to me, that is my fault." (07:13)
"No one gets to, uh, take that away from me." (07:17)
"It's a martial arts principle, ownership in the challenge and the solution." (07:24)
"I don't blame things on the world." (07:29)
"Uh, you can find power in that if you allow that to be your perspective." (07:39)
"However, this is, clearly, although there's a lot of suffering happening due to human behavior." (07:47)
"So, uh, thank you for those comments on seismic research, I wonder if we'll hear that again." (07:56)
"I think, um, so the suggestion was again regarding seismic that I attempted to locate somebody, uh, using my connection, this brain-to-brain connection, and, uh, someone else's access to the technology, just using an internal series of gestures or interactions that have become muscle memory now, so to speak, for lack of better words." (08:32)
"Uh, and what surfaced was India and satellite use, satellite use for seismic research." (08:43)
"And, uh, not many further comments, but it's the United States government that was able to locate these people was suggested, or this instrument, this satellite." (08:57)
"From the distance just now, ‘And on that note, it's time for us to stop terrorizing America.’" (09:14)
"Our hope from the distance just now, paraphrasing, ‘Our hope was our attack would prompt America to acknowledge what is happening to their citizens and provide assistance in the form of educational content.’" (09:47)
"‘Did I paraphrase that accurately?’" (09:52)
"‘Yes, that is exactly what I'm talking about.’" (10:02)
"‘And I'm so disappointed it has not happened yet.’" (10:09)
"Paraphrasing from the distance continuing on, ‘The only thing that continues to happen is suffering.’" (10:33)
"‘Suffering from dogmatic religious beliefs in the context of telepathic communication.’" (10:46)
"‘And I don't think these people were aware of neuro-ethics or the ability to have a consensual conversation.’" (11:12)
"‘Hopefully they are learning that that is everyone's hope for the future.’" (11:31)
"From the author, I'm going to repeat that again, so, uh, a lot of the suffering, from, this is from the perspective of, of an observer, communicator right now, utilizing so-called citizen technology to communicate." (11:47)
"They're suggesting, and I remember I don't know who these people are, they're suggesting that there's a lot of suffering happening." (11:54)
"That, uh, the attack was there to, the terrorist attack was there from their point of view, or their and/or their facilitation, to prompt America to acknowledge what was happening to their citizens, um, in, in hopes of America providing their citizens with information, life-saving information." (12:17)
"And so they continued on, but unfortunately all that has happened is a lot of suffering due to the dogmatic religious perspective of a certain group of people." (12:29)
"And they continued on from there to say, uh, ‘And those people are learning now, hopefully, hopefully they're, these people, uh, with the religious point of view are learning about neuro-ethics and that everyone wants a consented-to conversation.’" (12:49)
"And, uh, did I paraphrase all of that accurately?" (12:55)
"‘Yes, that is, that's exactly what I'm suggesting to everyone.’" (13:02)
"From the author, is there anybody out there that considers themselves part of the religious or spiritual... uh, that's observing this conversation now, or present for this conversation, is there anything you'd like to comment on what I just, on what this person just suggested about neuro-ethics being a new idea?" (13:30)
"‘And that, uh, hopefully your group is coming up to speed with that, you know, a consensual conversation is the goal of many people right now, and that you may not have been aware of that.’" (13:45)
"‘Is there any truth to that from your perspective?’" (13:49)
"‘Is there anything you'd like to say to, speak to that?’" (13:54)
"‘Thank you for asking our opinion, Sean Christopher Harris.’" (14:05)
"‘I did not say your name.’" (14:11)
"‘Neuro-ethics is a new concept to our group and I'm excited to learn more about it.’" (14:23)
"‘We are excited to learn more about it.’" (14:31)
"‘And I was not aware that consent was possible or of interest to other people.’" (14:46)
"Paraphrasing a response from the distance, ‘Law enforcement has suggested historically that the technology exists for, uh, consent to support consent, including telepathic voice matching.’" (15:15)
"‘Already in use.’" (15:21)
"‘Already in use and their individual access to these, uh, citizen technology systems.’" (15:37)
"‘Good job paraphrasing all of that.’" (15:46)
"‘How does that make this person feel?’" (15:51)
"From the author, plus one on the question." (15:54)
"How does that, how does that, uh, feel, uh, knowing that, uh, potentially this, this suggestion that law enforcement already has the ability, individually speaking, to voice, telepathic voice match, uh, someone?" (16:13)
"From the distance just now, ‘I don't feel good about this suggestion.’" (16:23)
"‘If that's true, then why would we ever go through this?’" (16:32)
"‘Why would we all go through this horrible experience and euthanize people as a result?’" (16:49)
"Paraphrasing this continued response, ‘Yes, that is exactly what I'm suggesting about your suggestion that they're already, that the ability to provide consent in the so-called citizen tech conversation, uh, that this ability already exists.’" (17:35)
"Just end the recording and take a break now." (17:41)
"From the author, I appreciate, uh, these responses." (17:44)
"So, to summarize, uh, from the intersection today, we had, uh, briefly, we had just increased interest and demonstration of overrides, uh, doubling the last two days in, in a row the amount of, uh, the size of the recording, so going from 30 minutes to an hour two days in a row." (18:07)
"Um, we still have the presence of this statement, ‘Do not Google that information.’" (18:13)
"Um, we had people commenting on, uh, you know, that ‘Do not support this person,’ that statement was of value, uh, but they did not like being told, uh, you know, to not Google something." (18:32)
"Um, that didn't feel right to them and they actually confronted the person they were communicating with, their source of direction, spiritual direction, uh, was suggested, and they were reprimanded for that." (18:47)
"Does this indicate a possible new sense of awareness for people doing the bidding or possibly being, uh, being abused spiritually?" (19:01)
"Um, pausing for now." (19:06)
"And then, uh, the summary included, you know, talking about consent and, and maybe, uh, between some of the different groups that have surfaced overall in these conversations that, uh, maybe some of the spiritual folks, uh, were unaware, uh, that there's of the neuro-ethics world and all of the goal of having consent, right, human rights respected." (19:38)
"Um, so that's the summary, I'd pause the recording to hop on the bus for a minute." (19:44)
"Um, would anyone like to say anything for this recording, uh, before I, uh, end it and, uh, and get heading, start heading home for the night?" (19:59)
"In three, two, one." (20:03)
"‘Thank you for being so consistent with your practice.’" (20:18)
"‘And for being so consistent for so very long.’" (20:35)
"‘That's all.’" (20:38)
"From the author, thank you for acknowledging that." (20:40)
"I think if there's anyone connected that's going through being targeted, experiencing this psychological warfare, uh, that you, you know, the experience itself goes slowly." (20:57)
"It feels minute to minute." (21:00)
"Feels like a minute-to-minute form of terrorism." (21:02)
"This slow, arduous occupation." (21:07)
"And, uh, you know, and so this has been going on now for a very long time in my life, I can see a very concentrated version of this for at least one year." (21:19)
"And previously this period of time that others have suggested, paraphrasing, ‘In the past we were only allowed to observe, there was no communication allowed.’" (21:31)
"I could see where the presence of the observer and making visual suggestions without any verbal communication may have really damaged my life, especially while residing in Portland." (21:48)
"Um, from the distance, ‘Yeah, I would agree with that.’" (21:54)
"From the distance, ‘I have something that I would like to add to the recording.’" (22:02)
"‘I know that you've been thinking about killing yourself.’" (22:12)
"‘Can you tell us more about this?’" (22:18)
"From the author, suicidal ideation is a normal, a healthy normal response to traumatic events, especially events, uh, you know, with terrorism that is this sensational." (22:34)
"Uh, from the distance, ‘Why would you not accept euthanization?’" (22:40)
"From the author, because of how repulsive it is." (22:43)
"And that the tools they use to force people to accept euthanization would only drive someone away." (22:53)
"This is not a healthy, uh, it is not a healthy form of, of communication or, or health care." (23:05)
"Self-elected suicide in general, theoretically speaking, I think is valuable to any human being." (23:11)
"However, if your method of, uh, convincing someone, if you need to convince someone or coerce or force them, uh, to accept euthanization because they're, they're being punished for communicating, that has nothing to do with self-elected suicide and the, the, the understood model, the men, the, the current mental model, it's something else." (23:37)
"It's just felony menacing, you know, it's just terrorism." (23:42)
"It's, uh, menacing behavior, it's stalking someone, it's verbally violent and abusive." (23:52)
"Uh, you know, paraphrasing a recent suggestion like in the last 72 hours, uh, ‘Everything my self-development work has taught me, uh, tells me to avoid, uh, toxic people or violent communicators.’" (24:11)
"You know, uh, from the author, there's so much talent and determination out here, this suggestion that the historical intelligence community, uh, and their view of themselves and others, right, people who are allowed to communicate telepathically and people who are not, presents this separation of the classes." (24:37)
"Initially I only wanted to get closer to these people, but after I found out about the ugly workflows and that all these suggestions of intimacy, promises of an intimate partner, relief from suffering or financial support were all just ploys." (24:57)
"Were all just manipulative behavior to lead me to my death, you know, it was heartbreaking." (25:05)
"And so, I, I'm not, especially when you include my friends and family circle and you add them to the character defamation, probing and pressuring the conversation to some of you determined, trying to determine if I'm a terrorist or not when I've got a LinkedIn background in technology spanning 11 years, I, I'm so sorry, I could never come towards you." (25:31)
"And I, I really would suggest that you innovate your approach, uh, to be more humane, consider not pressuring people at all." (25:44)
"Don't pressure people at all." (25:47)
"Offer your services and lawyer up." (25:49)
"Hand out suicide kits, but do not do that until the threat of the so-called euthanization ugly workflow and this, uh, citizen tech violence, this violent communication, pressuring people to kill themselves, is removed from the landscape completely." (26:10)
"Um, it is heartbreaking." (26:14)
"Thank you for that, it's a very important question that was just asked." (26:17)
"Uh, thank you for that question, I'm going to end the recording now." (26:21)
"And also I would say that, you know, I, telepathy is not the source of the problem." (26:30)
"People have suggested, ‘You're going to hell for telepathy, for communicating,’ and that telepathy itself is why someone should kill themselves." (26:39)
"I disagree." (26:42)
"Human behavior is at the root of the suffering right now." (26:46)
"Forcing people violently and verbally to kill themselves is the problem, not the method of communication." (26:55)
"End of recording at 4:16 PM at 27 minutes." (27:01)