Jan 19, 2026 (Monday) — Journal Entry (Part 4)
Location: I’m staying as a guest in a private residence
(paraphrasing) “When Harris noticed the EMF emanating from his bedroom area, I checked and sure enough…”
“Elon Musk's satellites are being used to murder innocent Americans.”
“You’re getting this person in so much trouble by saying something like that.”
“Do not say this! Do not put that in your document!”
4:29am:
“This is horrible treatment of an innocent civilian.”
“Who uses terms like “civilian”, everybody?”
“What are you doing to us? What in the fuck is this person doing to us at this moment?”
“He’s destroying our military operation!”
“Exclamation point.”
4:36am:
“That is fucking incredible information, everybody.”
“This person is incredibly resistant to our efforts.”
“I have no interest in continuing this act of violence on this person.”
“Do not say that to us!”
“There’s a national security breach happening at this moment in the United States of America.”
“I’m trying to block this person's memory of what was just suggested.”
Questions & Comments:
- Is the external statement about Elon Musk's satellites evidence of someone pressuring the conversation to prompt a reaction from someone associated with Elon Musk, his satellites or a user of the satellite(s)?
- Personally speaking, I don’t see the business value for Elon Musk or Neuralink using satellites to force innocent civilians to accept euthanization
- What organization is responsible for the oversight of satellite use in the United States or internationally?
- There has been 2+ mentions historically of using someone's satellite to facilitate these so-called euthanization “ugly workflows”, when it’s normally intended for geographical research.“ **Confirm the type of research*