Concepts

What is a brain/cloud interface?

51AI analysisDocumented

An idea drawn from this archive’s research and journal, either the author’s own speculation or generated by AI, and labelled as such.

It is a proposal, published in 2019 in Frontiers in Neuroscience by researchers associated with UC Berkeley and the Institute for Molecular Manufacturing. The paper describes a future discipline it calls neuralnanorobotics: nanoscale robots that would travel through the bloodstream, cross the blood–brain barrier, position themselves among or even inside brain cells, and relay information wirelessly between the brain and cloud computing in real time. The authors call the result a human brain/cloud interface, and suggest it might be possible within 20 to 30 years.

The paper presents these robots as future technology. Nothing like them has been built or demonstrated, and the paper reports no experiment showing one working.

On the record: the paper points to one real experiment as an early step. BrainNet, published by University of Washington researchers in Scientific Reports in 2019, let three people jointly play a Tetris-like game by sending yes-or-no decisions from brain to brain. It used EEG caps to read signals and magnetic stimulation of the visual cortex to deliver them, with every participant wearing equipment and taking part willingly. It involved no nanotechnology.

A note on words. The same paper uses the phrase "transparent shadowing" for experiencing parts of another person's life through such an interface. It is unrelated to transparent brain-computer interfaces, which are named for a see-through material.

Why it matters here: statements recorded in this archive describe everyone being connected, and a proposal like this one shows that the idea has been written down by researchers. It does not show that it exists. For what nanoscale technology can do today, see How small is nanotechnology, and what can it do today?.

  • Martins et al., 'Human Brain/Cloud Interface', Frontiers in Neuroscience 13:112, 29 March 2019
  • The paper presents neuralnanorobots as future technology and suggests 20 to 30 years
  • BrainNet (Scientific Reports, 2019): three-person brain-to-brain interface using EEG and transcranial magnetic stimulation, with consenting participants

Open questions

  • A published proposal records an idea and its authors' estimate. It is not evidence that the technology exists or that the estimate is right.

Not independently verified

This concept reports a published proposal and one published experiment. It does not establish that any brain/cloud interface exists.

Topics: Nanotechnology · Technology · Speculation

Keep reading

50AI analysisDocumented

How small is nanotechnology, and what can it do today?

Nanotechnology works at roughly 1 to 100 nanometres. A nanometre is one billionth of a metre. A sheet of paper is about 100,000 nanometres thick. A ladder of sizes helps: - A sheet of graphene: one atom thick, a fraction of a nanometre. - A lipid nanoparticle in an mRNA vaccine: roughly 100 nanometres, about the size of a virus. - A neuron's cell body: thousands to tens of thousands of nanometres across. - A sheet of paper: about 100,000 nanometres. - A 2016 neural dust sensor: about 3 millimetres long, or 3,000,000 nanometres. The last line is the point most often missed. Most of what is called nanotechnology in brain research is a device of ordinary, visible size built from nanomaterials: graphene electrodes, nanowire mesh, a millimetre-scale sensor. The parts that are truly nanoscale are particles, and a particle on its own cannot compute, store or transmit anything. What nanoscale technology does today, on the record: - Carries medicines and genetic instructions into cells, as in mRNA vaccines and other approved nanomedicines. - Makes electrodes thinner, softer or transparent, as in transparent brain-computer interfaces and graphene arrays now being tested in people during surgery. - Converts energy sent from outside the body into a local effect, in laboratories and animals: magnetoelectric nanoparticles respond to a magnetic field, and in optogenetics upconversion nan

NanotechnologyTechnologyRead →
01Author's observationPattern

What Does a Future with Consent Look Like?

In the author's speculation, the world's population could be experiencing telepathic communication that no one has consented to. It is not limited to words. It can reach any of the physical senses. - Verbal communication. It can be heard aloud on the neurotech bullhorn. - Inside the skull. With the ears held shut, it can still be experienced internally, through voice-to-skull (V2K) technology. - Phantom sensations. Something felt on or in the body that has no visible cause. - Augmented reality visuals. Images added to what a person sees (see The Diving Ecosystem, Capability 9). None of it has been consented to. Statements suggest that most of it is weapons development, carried out by certain organizations within a union of approximately 200 organizations that has been sold access to the population of the United States, and of other countries. That rests on statements alone and is unverified. On the record: the microwave auditory effect is documented in laboratory research: pulsed microwaves can be heard as clicks or buzzes that seem to come from inside the head. No published research shows it delivering speech to a person at a distance. The feeling of something crawling on the skin, and brief glimpses of things that are not there, have many known medical causes and are worth a doctor's assessment (see The Diving Ecosystem, Capability 9). From the author: "Wouldn't a mobile

Proposed solutionsSpeculationTechnologyRead →
06Author's observationPattern

The Diving Ecosystem

A hypothetical system, suggested to be a military deployment, that supports telepathic communication. Its suggested purpose is to give an invading force full transparency over all communication within enemy territory. That transparency would cover more than speech: through the Diving process, with or without a computer, it would reach the memories of people inside that territory. This concept is the author's speculation. It describes a hypothetical system and does not assert that the system exists. Every statement recorded in the journal is an external communication; read this concept under the Critical Disclaimer. Do not reward their presence: the author's caution In the author's experience, the system is generally used to provoke people and draw them out of their homes. When it began, in 2023, the voices presented themselves as the spirit world. Once the author researched neuroscience and realised they were human beings, he ended every relationship with any so-called invisible friend, anyone communicating on the system. The author's view is that it is vital not to reward their illegitimate presence. Rewarding it erodes the constitutional rights of everyone around you, and your own most of all, and it puts your life at risk. Their refusal to share contact details through any public, accountable channel is a serious red flag. For anyone experiencing this kind of communicatio

SpeculationTechnologySurveillance & memory accessRead →