Do Not Choose Yourself

This concept is being written in parts. More of it is being recorded and will be added.

This concept is the author's speculation. It does not assert that the system it describes exists. Every statement recorded in the journal is an external communication, and every statement heard on the bullhorn requires verification. Read this concept under the Critical Disclaimer.

What does it mean to have an invisible friend?

Suppose, hypothetically, that someone begins to humor a friendly relationship with a voice that reaches them directly, by voice-to-skull (V2K) communication. On the other end is a person in an office, presenting themselves through their own point-of-view eyesight, on a monitor, as an avatar: an extraterrestrial, someone from the spirit world, or a human being who is not who they claim to be.

The first experience feels spiritual. Imagine what that could mean for people of faith. Perhaps the voice appears as a father who has died, or a grandmother.

The person allows it to exist in their mind. They decide, almost without noticing, to explore it. They never say yes out loud; they simply let the friendship happen. And it is one of the most remarkable, profound experiences of their life. It feels authentically human, because it comes with phantom sensations, with what have been described as "emotional wristbands," and with a brain-to-brain connection, a conversation held mind to mind.

It goes on for months. There are awkward moments: in the bathroom, and in the most private moments of all, which may be met with punishment, or, more often, with reward. Every day, from a distance, from a control room or an office, someone works to appeal to the person's circumstances.

Then, after three to six months, something changes. Harmful information surfaces about someone in their life, or about a complete stranger. And they are asked to do something. They are invited to become part of a community: potentially, the euthanization culture.

What is that community? Before answering, consider what it means to humor this friendship at all.

How it began for the author

About three years ago, people presented themselves to the author as extraterrestrials and as the spirit world. Some appeared in white, flowing robes; some wore what were plainly costumes. Most of those who appeared looked Caucasian or Asian.

He had no explanation for how any of this was possible. Even with more than twelve years in the technology industry, he had never heard of neurotechnology. So there was always an awkwardness, at the back of his mind. He was trying to get back on his feet and recover his health, and alongside the positive communication, the harassment carried on in the background.

External location

There is a whole story behind what has been called an external location: a neuro-engagement exercise in which people in another warehouse, or another office, connect themselves to a person through the Diving process, facilitated by a computer or without one, and try to befriend them.

What is the point? And what does it do to the community?

Why it matters: the impact on you, and on others

After what may now be five years of unconsented, unexplained communication, the author's advice comes down to one rule.

Never reward an unconsented, unexplained neurotechnological relationship. Here is why.

The risk to your life is severe. And it is not only your safety at stake. The people around you are endangered too.

It is a serious red flag, from a law enforcement perspective and from a mental health perspective alike: another human being trying to gain your confidence through an unexplained, unregulated neurotechnological channel. What makes it stranger, and less safe, is that the whole exchange can be heard by many people at once, on the neurotech bullhorn.

Rewarding it will feel normal at first. It may even be one of the greatest spiritual experiences of your life. Now imagine what that means for a devout Christian, a devout Catholic, or a devout Muslim, who is then asked to do things.

If a voice asks you to do something, especially to harm yourself or anyone else, tell someone you trust. In an emergency, call 911; if you are struggling, call or text 988.

See also the author's caution in The Diving Ecosystem: do not reward their presence.

"How do you feel about our presence?"

Sometimes the question comes directly, through the system. Set the stage: an organization that seems to be trying to be forthcoming, even transparent. In paraphrase: We just want you to know that we're in a control room, communicating with you. How does that make you feel? What do you think of this moment?

Perhaps you have been asked for feedback, or to take part in an "eyesight study" of how you use software: AI tools, phone apps, desktop applications. Hypothetically, a control room is observing you, and it is not harassing you. That matters. It may even say, This is our time with you. As long as we're here, you won't be attacked. We'll defend you.

That is not how this began. Two to three years ago it was, so to speak, a free-for-all. So when you weigh your own opinion, and you may well be enjoying the moment, whether it is an invisible friend or a group that has spent time getting to know you, consider what it means for you, your loved ones, your family and the people around you.

Should you reward it?

Here is the first thing to consider. Should you reward an unconsented neurotechnological relationship: someone who arrived without permission, without explanation, and who still refuses to tell you who they are?

The author, writing as someone who has lived through exactly this for years, says no. You can never reward that relationship. Do not choose yourself.

It makes no difference whether the presence comes from a local government cloud system or from a foreign adversary's. You cannot reward it. You cannot choose yourself.

Rewarding it can be as simple as answering questions. Someone asks you something through this telepathic system, and you answer, and you keep on answering. In the author's view, every answer erodes the constitutional rights and the public safety of every person, and above all your own.

If you keep rewarding it, are you eroding, or even destroying, the constitutional rights of yourself and of everyone else, in whatever country they live?

The public safety risk: the "ugly workflow"

The risk to public safety is severe. Something has surfaced, historically, under the name of the military "ugly workflow": a strategy for luring a person out of their home. It has several versions. In one of the main ones, the target is encouraged into a sexual act, has a good experience, and is then asked to come outside and walk three blocks west.

What happens if they do? Are they euthanized? Beheaded? According to statements going back two to three years, a biotech organization then collects their property. There is no funeral, and perhaps a missing-persons report, depending on who they were.

Please understand: if you humor an invisible friend now, you may be taking the first step down a road you never come back from. Do not go outside when you are asked to, and do not open the door. In an emergency, call 911.

Is this happening elsewhere?

Imagine that this is an organization speaking not only to American citizens, but to the citizens of other countries too.

South Korea's suicide rate more than doubled in a decade, peaking around 2010 and 2011. The United States' rate has risen by about 35% since 1999, and the pace doubled from 2006. Is South Korea experiencing something similar to America?

On the record: South Korea's age-standardized suicide rate rose from 15.1 per 100,000 in 2000 to 34.9 in 2010 (WHO), then declined. The US age-adjusted rate rose from 10.5 in 1999 to 14.2 in 2018 and again in 2022 (CDC). Researchers attribute these trends to many causes, and none of them is established as related to this system. Rising at the same time is not the same as rising for the same reason (see The world's suicide rate fell. The United States' rose. and Next to each other is not because of each other). If you are struggling, call or text 988, at any time.

Do not choose yourself: how you carry yourself

Do not choose yourself in these moments. And this is not only about protecting your own life. It is also about how you carry yourself.

Will you support euthanization? Will you open your home, your partner, your children, to supporting it, so that you end up harassing someone else because you need to survive?

This comes up often, because there is no explanation. There is a very large pattern of communication in which people are torn, and households are torn. They want to survive this. In paraphrase: We're going to survive this by supporting euthanization. And what follows, every time, is that they harass, locate and euthanize American citizens in order to survive.

Do not choose yourself in that moment.

This is not sustainable

Euthanizing American citizens, or any citizens, over the bullhorn cannot go on. It is absurd to think it could. There is no future in it, and it is not sustainable.

In the author's opinion, the whole industry is bottlenecked. There is so much talent out there. What has been created? And what are we being prompted to do?

Topics: Speculation · Technology · Harassment · Euthanization · Proposed solutions