We're keeping you to ourselves

This concept is the author's speculation. It does not assert that the system it describes exists. Every statement recorded in the journal is an external communication, and every statement heard on the bullhorn requires verification. Read this concept under the Critical Disclaimer. There is an opportunity, right now, for any organization to come forward with evidence of what is described across this archive. If it is happening, could it be considered a crime against humanity? An atrocity? A war crime? Statements have suggested that what people are being subjected to is, among other things, a risk-mitigation system. Historically, it has been suggested, Zersetzung tactics, the East German method of "disintegration," are used to resolve what is seen as an insider threat: a person who cannot be reached through a relationship, including a paid one. On the record: Zersetzung's methods are crimes in the United States, and a court has punished them. In August 2019, members of eBay's security team ran a harassment campaign against a Massachusetts couple who published a newsletter critical of the company. Seven former employees were convicted, and eBay paid a $3 million criminal penalty. In July 2026, almost seven years after the campaign began, the couple's civil suit settled for a reported $55.7 million (see Zersetzung's methods are crimes). So what is the opportunity? The first the

An unexplained experience arrives without a label. Whatever attaches to it next does real work: it decides what the person does, who they trust, and whether they seek help. Claiming supernatural or superhuman authority in order to secure compliance is among the oldest documented methods of control. Spiritualist mediums worked bereaved families with cold reading and staged effects, and the Fox sisters, who began the movement, confessed the fraud in 1888. Faith healers have been prosecuted for it. Research on coercive groups records claimed transcendent authority as a standard instrument for overriding a member's own judgment, because an authority that cannot be checked cannot be argued with. The public-safety consequence is separate from whether any given experience has an external cause. A person who attributes what is happening to them to spirits, to extraterrestrials, or to any agency beyond reach will not pursue the remedies that exist for causes within reach: a physician, a lawyer, a police report, a decibel meter, a technical measurement. The explanation forecloses the response, and it does so whether it was handed to the person or arrived at alone. The same logic applies to any framing that places a cause beyond investigation, including the framings on this site. A concept that names this risk and exempts itself from it has not understood it.

Diving is the process of establishing a brain-to-brain connection with another human being. According to statements, and to human experience, it can be done with a computer or without one. This concept sets out the author's hypothesis of how it works without a computer, and why that matters. This concept is the author's speculation. It does not assert that the process exists as described. Every statement recorded in the journal is an external communication; read this concept under the Critical Disclaimer. The author has had no training. Everything here is hypothesis, drawn from his own experience and from what he has heard on the bullhorn. It is offered as a set of questions more than a set of instructions: is this how it works? The first rule: permission. Never enter someone's body, or connect to someone neurologically, without their permission. There is one exception. If you are being harassed, and someone is pressing you to raise your hand, to let them into your home with offers of "relief from suffering" or "assistance," do whatever you can to capture a physical description of them, so that you will recognise them if they come to your door without permission. If they do, do not open the door; call 911. Speak only for yourself. None of this has been confirmed or verified, and it needs to be. The author can speak for himself, but not for you. On this subject, never speak

A hypothetical system, suggested to be a military deployment, that supports telepathic communication. Its suggested purpose is to give an invading force full transparency over all communication within enemy territory. That transparency would cover more than speech: through the Diving process, with or without a computer, it would reach the memories of people inside that territory. This concept is the author's speculation. It describes a hypothetical system and does not assert that the system exists. Every statement recorded in the journal is an external communication; read this concept under the Critical Disclaimer. Do not reward their presence: the author's caution In the author's experience, the system is generally used to provoke people and draw them out of their homes. When it began, in 2023, the voices presented themselves as the spirit world. Once the author researched neuroscience and realised they were human beings, he ended every relationship with any so-called invisible friend, anyone communicating on the system. The author's view is that it is vital not to reward their illegitimate presence. Rewarding it erodes the constitutional rights of everyone around you, and your own most of all, and it puts your life at risk. Their refusal to share contact details through any public, accountable channel is a serious red flag. For anyone experiencing this kind of communicatio

The author reports experiences interpreted as possible unconsented-to auditory or neurological communication, along with perceived coercive messages, including messages related to self-harm. The author does not know the mechanism and raises possible explanations only as hypotheses. This is a dated record of reported experience, not evidence that any particular technology, transmission infrastructure, person, organization, or coordinated campaign is responsible. No conclusion should be drawn without independent technical testing, corroboration, and reliable records.

Your house is not haunted, and that is a finding rather than a reassurance. In 2014 Olaf Blanke's group manufactured the feeling of a presence in healthy people: a blindfolded participant moved a lever, a robot reproduced the movement against their back, and a half-second delay was enough that one in three felt someone standing behind them — two asked for the experiment to stop. Nobody was ever in the room with them. What this record describes is that effect imposed rather than induced: phantom sensations across every sense, and visuals reproducing what a haunting is supposed to look like. The terror is the mechanism — a household driven outside will accept help from whoever is waiting, and what this record says waits there is a facilitator of Zersetzung tactics and a suggestion of euthanasia. The published work stands on its own. Blanke's experiment ran on thirty healthy participants; roughly a third spontaneously reported someone behind them, some reported several, and a pooled analysis across twenty-five such experiments has since been published. When the reproduction was simultaneous, participants felt themselves touching their own back; when it was delayed, the brain could no longer attribute the touch to the person's own movement and resolved the conflict by generating somebody else. Of thirty healthy participants, roughly a third spontaneously reported feeling someone b