Aug 24, 2025 — Recording 2 (10:37) (Part 2)

Aug 24, 2025 — Recording 2 (10:37)

Audio: 20250824-103748.mp3 · Duration 00:13

**Time uncertain, capturing a quick recording of a suggestion*

"We should have listened to this person when he sent us the document. [00:04]

"Instead we chose to euthanize him. [00:08]

##### Manual Capture

**10:50am, While I attempt to meditate on a bench at the rose gardens in Cheeseman Park I receive the following telepathic suggestions*

“Have you ever considered accepting euthanization to help other people?” **Female #1*

“Unbelievable!” **Female #2*

“Let me explain, everybody!” **Female #1?*

“This is about the safety of the people around you!” **Female #1?*

“Do not accept euthanization from these people! These people are fucking demented.” **Male #1*

“Ok Sean. I want to tell you why it's important but I don't want you adding it to the discovery doc.” **Female #1*

“Ok Sean. I can see that you are not going to accept euthanization or assistance from anyone using this method of communication.” **Female #2?*

“I can see the public safety risk now. It's very important that this becomes a consented to conversation.” **Female #1?*

“Microsoft is in a lot of trouble over this situation.” **Male #2?*

“Stop saying that!” **Male#*?

“Oh Jesus. Are we not the sickest people you could imagine? Please do not send this to anyone!” **Female #?*

Questions & Comments:

- Do not reward these publicly unaccountable people for their un-consented to life threatening communication

- I am not a fan of accusing organizations of euthanization or anything else using this method of communication. At the moment, the most valuable thing someone can do is release an official statement and include adequate technology demonstrations to the appropriate and publicly facing channels.