IS-J02-20250915-R01JournalTranscriptParaphrasingRecorded transcriptionProposed solutionsSpeculationTechnologyDeath threatsEuthanizationSurveillance & memory accessLaw enforcement & governmentRescue & public announcements

Sep 15, 2025 — Recording 1 (11:01) (Part 2)

2025-09-15 · Monday · audio ↗ · source ↗
Glossary: Artificial intelligence, Telepathy, Torment

Sep 15, 2025 — Recording 1 (11:01)

Audio: 20250915-110144.mp3

**11:01am, a voice within the “Citizen Tech” phenomena asks me why I have not accepted euthanization. Unfortunately the recording was stopped unintendly towards the end of the conversation.*

File duration: 19 minutes 21 seconds

"Let's see here. It's 11:01 a.m. Monday, September 15th, 2000" [00:03]

"25." [00:08]

"This is Sean Christopher Harris. Someone's just asked me to do" [00:12]

"some repeating." [00:14]

"It's going to do my recap, but for a blessed type, but let's see uh" [00:18]

"let's see what uh" [00:22]

"someone has to say here." [00:24]

"Uh" [00:25]

"administrative note." [00:30]

"Beginning the repeating process for today in three," [00:33]

"two," [00:35]

"one." [00:36]

"Okay, I have some information for you." [00:42]

"We're coming through with 100% accuracy, everybody." [00:51]

"I did not say that. I wonder if we'll even get through this." [01:01]

"Let's see what this person has to say, everybody." [01:11]

"Still repeating." [01:13]

"Still repeating." [01:15]

"So it's come to our attention that you simply refuse to accept euthanasia." [01:31]

"Would you consider killing yourself?" [01:42]

"We don't understand." [01:55]

"uh paraphrasing. We don't understand, we don't see how someone would" [02:00]

"want to continue on living." [02:04]

"Would you care to share that with us?" [02:11]

"Administrative note," [02:13]

"uh," [02:16]

"I'm not sure what the assumptions are around" [02:20]

"why someone would accept euthanasia, but what I'm experiencing is" [02:25]

"the life-threatening behavior of" [02:29]

"adults, human beings." [02:31]

"Maybe artificial intelligence at times." [02:34]

"And those are things that can be corrected." [02:38]

"Those are also things that require money." [02:42]

"Otherwise, there is no problem." [02:45]

"What do you think? End of administrative note, returning to the repeating process" [02:52]

"in three," [02:54]

"two, one." [02:56]

"Okay, so that is actually the situation we are in." [03:05]

"We could not spend any more money on this one person." [03:18]

"This individual person is what I suggested." [03:27]

"This may provide enough sound for us to continue this conversation." [03:42]

"We could not continue to euthanize people in the city of Denver." [03:55]

"I don't have any information like that." [04:03]

"Still repeating." [04:05]

"Still repeating." [04:06]

"Well, you most likely will in the not too distant future." [04:20]

"Understand if you continue euthanizing people in the city of Denver, you may fall victim to capital punishment." [04:45]

"That is being assured to me by a few people in Colorado's state government." [05:06]

"Is this another counter narrative?" [05:13]

"Because it makes you look more guilty now that this has happened." [05:25]

"Still repeating." [05:27]

"Still repeating." [05:29]

"What does the author think of that?" [05:37]

"Administrative note, I will answer that." [05:41]

"Um" [05:43]

"a handful of organizations," [05:48]

"well, the suggestion of a handful of organizations" [05:51]

"has happened in the past" [05:54]

"where" [05:56]

"Microsoft" [05:58]

"has stood out against euthanasia." [06:01]

"Homeland security has intervened and stood against" [06:07]

"euthanasia," [06:09]

"right? Doing internal housekeeping." [06:13]

"The Denver Police Department." [06:16]

"Um, and so now the state of Colorado," [06:22]

"I feel like I'm missing one." [06:25]

"FBI is" [06:27]

"a daily mention." [06:30]

"Uh" [06:32]

"as far as" [06:34]

"the suggestion of assistance, uh, I think that I I don't" [06:39]

"I couldn't, you know," [06:42]

"say whether or not this is accurate. It would need to be uh substantiated" [06:47]

"with" [06:49]

"news media coverage, official statements," [06:53]

"technology demonstration, testimony" [06:56]

"or the absence" [06:59]

"of tormenting these ugly workflows." [07:03]

"But" [07:04]

"as far as looking guilty, it's it's interesting that" [07:08]

"in the last 24 hours, someone suggested" [07:12]

"that they are paid to euthanize people by the state of Colorado." [07:17]

"And now at" [07:19]

"11:30 a.m." [07:22]

"approximately" [07:23]

"we're getting a statement on how capital punishment could" [07:28]

"be given to people. I think I would heed the warning," [07:33]

"nonetheless." [07:34]

"If you are euthanizing people because I don't see euthanasia" [07:39]

"or these ugly workflows lasting" [07:43]

"forever." [07:45]

"And know that my testimony is ready and waiting." [07:51]

"I hope that's helpful. End of administrative note and the answer to that question, what do I think about" [07:59]

"this morning." [08:02]

"And uh, thank you for your service. End of administrative note," [08:05]

"returning to the repeating process in three," [08:11]

"two, one." [08:13]

"I don't know what to say to that." [08:24]

"brain.space." [08:27]

"Also suggested supporting this person." [08:34]

"himself." [08:37]

"He's nodding his head." [08:43]

"Administrative note, still repeating," [08:50]

"still repeating." [08:52]

"Uh," [08:54]

"administrative note, yes, I was nodding my head." [08:58]

"is this continued evidence of the" [09:02]

"breaching process or the penetration" [09:06]

"of human beings" [09:09]

"for access to information from their brains." [09:12]

"Right? Their eyes," [09:15]

"physical sensations," [09:17]

"End of administrative note, returning to the repeating process for another round." [09:24]

"in three," [09:26]

"two," [09:27]

"one." [09:28]

"So, you don't believe any of this information?" [09:43]

"He said it would need to be substantiated." [09:49]

"Yes, I would agree with that." [09:55]

"Still repeating, still repeating." [09:59]

"Two people are agreeing with that." [10:05]

"Well, there won't be any substantiation because it is a counter narrative." [10:19]

"That is not my voice saying that." [10:27]

"And we're very disappointed to hear this doubt coming from everybody." [10:43]

"And now you've moved the conversation in front of you again." [10:55]

"You're talking to some people that" [11:07]

"we're talking to some people that we could not identify with" [11:13]

"our system." [11:15]

"Still repeating." [11:16]

"Still repeating." [11:18]

"That's because this is the CIA system." [11:27]

"And it's very important that people just believe what I am saying." [11:40]

"Still repeating." [11:43]

"Still repeating." [11:45]

"No, you're not going to make it look like he's making this up or prescribing it himself." [12:02]

"Yes, that's exactly what I said with word for word accuracy, everybody." [12:17]

"Okay, Sean, that's the message I wanted to share." [12:29]

"I hope people actually listen." [12:33]

"Because we can't find these people using our system." [12:43]

"This is citizen tech that Homeland security uses." [12:54]

"And we found another system running that the drug enforcement administration uses." [13:10]

"And now there seems to be a third system that no one can account for." [13:25]

"That's a question, everybody." [13:32]

"So I need to understand who's making claims that the state of Colorado is paying for euthanasia." [13:55]

"Will this be in your document later today, Sean Christopher Harris?" [14:10]

"Administrative note, yes," [14:13]

"it will be uh added. I add the most recent" [14:18]

"transcripts first." [14:20]

"End of administrative note, returning to the repeating process." [14:26]

"in three," [14:28]

"two," [14:29]

"one." [14:31]

"Administrative note is how he can answer questions while he's repeating." [14:43]

"That's a question, everybody." [14:48]

"He's nodding his head again." [14:53]

"It really helps if you have different tones of voices, Sean Christopher Harris." [15:08]

"And now, where's the sound coming from?" [15:15]

"So he puts it wherever there's noise coming from." [15:25]

"He's nodding his head again." [15:31]

"You should explain that to us." [15:38]

"Um" [15:39]

"Administrative note, I will explain that." [15:42]

"Uh" [15:45]

"yes, it's as if" [15:47]

"I mean if somebody is using" [15:51]

"this suggestion of ionic sound, for example," [15:55]

"when you have residual noise from the street system," [16:00]

"there is the intersection of that noise" [16:04]

"and whatever is being used to communicate." [16:07]

"So, if it's a beam of sound or if it's" [16:11]

"some other form of" [16:14]

"technology," [16:16]

"there is the intersection" [16:18]

"and it appears that one the individual's awareness, my individual awareness" [16:25]

"can change where sound comes from." [16:31]

"It's uh" [16:34]

"it's really interesting." [16:38]

"It makes me wonder if I do have an implant" [16:43]

"and there's some connection to my own focus" [16:47]

"and something inside my body that helps me complete this task." [16:53]

"Or if it's just" [16:56]

"ubiquitous sound." [16:59]

"I mean I would love the official explanation sometime." [17:05]

"End of administrative note, I hope that helps." [17:10]

"End of administrative note," [17:12]

"returning to the repeating process in three," [17:16]

"two, one." [17:18]

"Are you sure you're recording right now?" [17:24]

"I'm not trying to identify you." [17:33]

"Yes, he's recording." [17:44]

"And there's sound being captured." [17:51]

"Ask me how I know that. I'll just tell you." [17:58]

"You're very close on your interpretation of what's happening, by the way." [18:12]

"I think you're in quite a bit of physical danger at this moment." [18:25]

"Please don't say that to this person." [18:35]

"I'm going to sponsor your document." [18:44]

"And I want you to work tirelessly on that document until it's completed." [18:58]

"I don't think anyone's actually going to sponsor the document, Sean Christopher Harris." [19:11]

"I just said that." [19:17]

**End of recording. This recording ended unintendedly before the conversation was over.*

##### Notes from 12:00pm-1:00pm *In-progress

While walking to the Tattered Cover Bookstore to enter transcripts I find myself in the middle of another “Citizen Tech” conversation involving at least two groups of people. One group claims to be the Chinese government with their voices including accents emanating from somewhere far in the distance and the other group sounds like adult caucasians, with their voices emanating from a position much closer. In general there is a sense of surprise and deep concern from the caucasian voices for the suggestion of the Chinese government communicating with Denver, CO..

Additional notes:

- One of the so-called Chinese voices suggested that they hoped making contact with us telepathically would have been a more positive experience but due to the size of the threat of euthanization in Denver, CO. the situation was “life threatening”.

- The caucasian voices did not identify with any organization. However, suggestions were made i.e. (paraphrasing) “Homeland Security is not doing well with this information today.”

- Many attempts at identifying the so-called Chinese voices were made (paraphrasing) “Who is talking to this person? (myself, Sean C. Harris)”, (paraphrasing) “Who is speaking with us?”

- The so-called Chinese government voices suggested that had I not connected to the caucasians in the past, today’s conversation would not be possible. Is this suggestion and the conversation in general, evidence of the local facilitators of euthanization i.e. caucasians, finally acknowledging unknown communicators i.e. Chinese government?

- The caucasian voices asked the so-called chinese government if they were funding euthanization in America (paraphrasing) “Have you been funding euthanization in America?” and the response was (paraphrasing) “Yes, America.”

- However, voices claiming to be the Chinese government asked the caucasians why they were euthanizing their citizens.

- …

Questions & Comments:

- I did not inspect the so-called Chinese voices for the use of voice filters or the presence of an underlying voice. Unfortunately, the modification of voices is very common and there is also an assumption where A.I. Artificial Intelligence would need to build a telepathic voice from brain activity, possibly inviting an unintended disguise.

- In the past telepathic visual information has suggested the presence of asian and middle eastern facilitators using ethnic disguises. For example, asian people disguising themselves with masks or as middle eastern people and middle eastern people disguising themselves as asian people.

- All of that said, who are these people? Remember all “Citizen Tech” claims should be substantiated i.e. legally binding testimony, official statements, technology demonstrations, etc.

- How much of the above experience communicating was negatively impacted by manipulation?

- How does the threat of euthanization complicate the relationship between all groups and individuals communicating? Over time both sides have identified with the facilitation of euthanization.

- What are the differences in motivation for euthanizing America’s citizens? i.e. caucasians vs. so-called Chinese government.

- How many “Citizen Tech” systems are there? I.e. (paraphrasing) “We are aware of one D.E.A. (Drug Enforcement Administration) system and another C.I.A. (Central Intelligence Agency) system that Homeland Security uses but we were not aware of a Chinese government system.” *In-progress