Oct 2, 2025 (Thursday) — Journal Entry (Part 3)
Thursday October 2nd transcripts summary:
- Themes from the last 24hrs, takeaways from the night before and early morning including more POV (Point of View) visual information
- Who holds the keys to the “Citizen Tech” conversation and possible has influence over the so-called euthanization “ugly workflows” in Denver, CO.?
- Are we all experiencing “a world of opposites”? Would aligning ourselves with the Japanese philosophy of “Kaizen” help us move forward in our journey without punishing each other?
- Later at another “Battle for the Intersection”...
Methodology: I capture manual transcripts of the telepathic and or audible “Citizen Tech” phenomena by repeating the suggestions I receive out loud while recording using the native Android voice recorder. Transcriptions of the .mp3 recordings are generated with Google AI Studio. **See sample screen recording*
Scene: I’m traveling around downtown Denver, Colorado by scooter and on foot capturing recordings as needed.
Oct 2, 2025 — Recording 1 (09:20)
Open this recording on its own page
Audio: 20251002-092056-01.mp3
**9:21am, patterns of “Citizen Tech” suggestions from the last 24hrs and the night before.*
[32:41]
"It's 9:21 a.m. Thursday, October 2nd." [00:09]
"Uh, 2025." [00:16]
"This is Sean Christopher Harris capturing uh themes from the night before." [00:22]
"The last 24 hours." [00:24]
"Early morning, uh, POV information." [00:29]
"So, the unconsented to conversation is still present." [00:33]
"From from the distance paraphrasing, it's not going anywhere for at least another six weeks." [00:52]
"That's exactly what I said." [00:57]
"We're still working on finding all these troublemakers." [01:07]
"You can work on that with acknowledgement from someone else in the distance." [01:17]
"And that's your physical voice, isn't it, Sean?" [01:26]
"Yes, it is." [01:27]
"Response from the author, yes, it is my physical voice." [01:32]
"So, the unconsented to conversation is still present." [01:38]
"suggestions uh violent communication is still present, but right now it feels more like a debate at night." [01:52]
"The Hangman is uh the Hangman is present." [02:01]
"And that's becoming a pattern quickly." [02:03]
"The Hangman, his noose is waiting." [02:12]
"People uh it's coming." [02:17]
"For terrorism in America." [02:25]
"Patriotism will be rewarded from the distance right now." [02:39]
"I found a news article this morning, uh two from the India Times." [02:47]
"I really like using uh artificial intelligence to find news." [02:53]
"It's does a great job of it and it's two posts, right?" [03:02]
"I'll get back to themes." [03:04]
"Maybe it'll frontload this and then uh think about what's being suggested." [03:11]
"So, Microsoft News, Unit 8200 is an Israeli unit, uh is moving their data right now." [03:24]
"Microsoft investigation I spoke about, or suggested a few weeks, maybe a month ago, looking into their relationship with uh Israel, Department of Defense." [03:39]
"I'm not sure if that's the right word, right name for it, but so it turns out something showed up." [03:47]
"So, phone call data that had been uh artificial intelligence was used to harvest to basically collect information from Palestinian citizens, um was found." [04:05]
"The article suggests but that that's there's more, right?" [04:11]
"That was not everything." [04:14]
"And then a question I need to go find out is is Satya taking a a change uh moving into a different leadership role." [04:26]
"Uncertain of that one, I need to look at it." [04:30]
"Uh, maybe a new a new new leadership and engineering and Satya may be going to a I'm going to confirm this for the the transcript later, maybe going still working in artificial intelligence but in a different position." [04:50]
"Um, so back in February it was suggested that a terrorist attack was was claimed or something that happened to Iran, right?" [05:08]
"Palestinian people in general, Sean, from the distance." [05:15]
"And so, you know, what what I am experiencing and the people around me is a is a suggestion that information from our thoughts, so this is it wouldn't be phone call information." [05:33]
"It'd just access to our brains is what I'm hoping to find in the newspaper." [05:38]
"In the news, right, not the newspaper, but the news." [05:42]
"Uh, not enough coffee yet." [05:46]
"But just finding that article at least allowed for maybe a connection to what is happening in Denver to surface." [05:58]
"Um, so, let's give all of that said, let's get back to the themes." [06:06]
"Uh so the threat of euthanasia is still present." [06:10]
"What I mean by that is while sleeping in the shelter, attempting to sleep, someone asked me, you know, will you accept your euthanasia?" [06:21]
"Uh ability to manipulate these conversations, but also, uh instead of it just being me manipulating the real-time conversation, for example, overriding every word spoken to be absolutely or absolutely not." [06:41]
"Just this repeating mantra of absolutely, absolutely not." [06:48]
"Uh my goal here is to remind people that this is technology that they're experiencing." [06:56]
"Um, so that's still present." [07:02]
"And maybe something changes one day and it's no longer present, right?" [07:08]
"So, if one of these systems goes down, for example, is taken down and that doesn't work anymore." [07:19]
"Maybe there's no conversation." [07:23]
"Uh last night there was a heavy theme of drugs still being suggested to lure me out of the building." [07:29]
"I'm luring me out of the building part." [07:33]
"And the drugs being offered is kind of the whole point." [07:39]
"Uh, I mean, if this this is a group of human beings, right?" [07:46]
"Technology used by a group of human beings and these suggestions are being made." [07:52]
"Um, within those suggestions last night, Fentonol and the use of a water pipe, I guess, was suggested." [08:03]
"Right?" [08:05]
"And I'm wondering if this is just a simple kind of suggestion to measure my response." [08:12]
"There there is a surprise, you know, when I'm I'm not interested." [08:19]
"Uh paraphrasing suggestions after the the telepathic visual surfaces, right, along with my reaction, paraphrasing, why isn't he interested?" [08:33]
"He's not he's not using drugs, everybody." [08:37]
"And this is just a nightly, a daily a daily theme." [08:43]
"In the daytime, I'm suppressed at the intersection, in the nighttime, the behavior changes uh from these group of facilitators to more targeted, more personal." [08:58]
"Um, less sexual suggestion last night, mostly a focus on drugs." [09:05]
"And it feels like a sincere reaction in the distance of why isn't he interested?" [09:12]
"And it, you know, my first thought is, well, what kind of leadership is out there making these suggestions?" [09:22]
"The suggestion is is that there's some kind of offer, right?" [09:26]
"Over the last week to two weeks, uh paraphrasing, you need to accept assistance from the euthanasia people." [09:36]
"This is a very threatening statement." [09:38]
"It's it's no different to me that the organization of the words is a little different and the and the statement, the construction of the statement itself, but it's still uh you must accept euthanasia from my perspective, right?" [09:57]
"The individual's perspective." [09:59]
"And paraphrasing suggestions when that happens, and this speaks to the debate present." [10:07]
"So, is assistance arrived?" [10:09]
"Are we in a phase of awareness?" [10:12]
"Not just the public awareness of the use of technology, but America's protective awareness has something actually shown up." [10:23]
"Um, last night Homeland security was targeted." [10:28]
"So this conversation in the building, there's still a theme that people are not acknowledging that the conversation can be heard by anyone in the building." [10:38]
"That was debated." [10:42]
"Uh paraphrasing, uh if you people don't believe that the conversation could be heard in the building, then what what does that say?" [10:54]
"Where are you geographically speaking that you would not know that?" [11:00]
"Um, the presence of artificial intelligence voice agents, I'm wondering that this if this conversation and this kind of connects with it's kind of connects with the uh the overriding of the conversation." [11:22]
"So, when I begin the absolutely, absolutely not mantra, overriding all conversation with those words, it continues on its own for a little while." [11:35]
"Right?" [11:36]
"I stopped exerting myself." [11:38]
"and it takes very little mental exertion." [11:41]
"It's almost no exertion." [11:44]
"And the suggestion here is that my brain activity is connected to the brain activity of others, even maybe of these artificial intelligence voice agents and because it's exposed can, you know, is this brain activity that is exposed to all people in this mesh, this conversational mesh of human beings and systems?" [12:09]
"And if that is true, does any one individual have the ability to override the conversation?" [12:16]
"It would appear that that's happening and is there a presence of artificial intelligence or are the people who continue on with the mantra human beings, right?" [12:29]
"Or both?" [12:32]
"The debate itself, right, if Homeland security is is called out last night." [12:42]
"So, it's suggested that there is a focus on drugs." [12:48]
"Why is that?" [12:49]
"Why are drugs being talked about and is there an offer?" [12:55]
"The what is shown up in my defense suggests there is no offer, that this is predatory communication, and they what has shown up in the defense of the building and myself is asking why is there a focus, such a focus on drugs and suggesting that this is a distraction from the truth of the of the situation that is the no consent conversation and the spirituality narrative is should be the focus." [13:29]
"And uh that it's it's very dangerous." [13:32]
"It's a public safety crisis." [13:34]
"I'll uh take a moment to capture responses from the distance if anyone wants to comment on that." [13:43]
"Yes, I have a from the distance, yes, I have a comment about the use of artificial intelligence." [13:57]
"I will correct you if needed." [14:03]
"Artificial intelligence is absolutely part of what people in the city of Denver are experiencing." [14:33]
"You literally held your ears shut and had improved communication, didn't you Sean Christopher Harris?" [14:50]
"Yes, he absolutely does have improved communication." [14:59]
"Response for the author, thank you for your comments, your suggestions." [15:05]
"Yes, it's uh there is improved communication." [15:09]
"Returning to repeating in three, two, one." [15:14]
"End of response from author is much cleaner." [15:23]
"So all of that said is there an implant present?" [15:35]
"Or is this a standalone experience for the individual using a satellite and or cell towers?" [15:54]
"Yes, Sean." [15:58]
"I didn't get to complete what I was saying." [16:07]
"Still repeating, still repeating." [16:10]
"Please do not waste this person's time with false information, everybody." [16:24]
"I want to say something about the false accusation of Homeland security last night." [16:44]
"A drug task force was also suggested." [16:55]
"And you have visual information that you need to share with us, especially if you see any kind of identifying marks on someone." [17:18]
"Let's just go get this person so I could use them as a listening device." [17:34]
"He really should cross the street right now." [17:48]
"Okay, let's see what he says now." [17:55]
"Uh, continued responses from author." [18:00]
"Thank you for your comments." [18:02]
"Yes." [18:05]
"The drug task force was suggested last night." [18:09]
"And the homeland the the homeland security suggestion, so point of view visual information was suggested." [18:23]
"And I always cringe sharing this now because it's so there's just such a presence of character assassination and it's happened to just about anyone, especially after they after I connect with them, uh from a breaching perspective, right?" [18:46]
"Using their ears or nose." [18:48]
"That would be my preference." [18:55]
"Uh, no judgment, the other approach, the other more clandestine approach, I don't think it's very clandestine, but it and let's not get stuck on that." [19:14]
"So, POV visual information and and uh telepathic visual information." [19:24]
"There was a couple, two women in the past, two Caucasian females, uh they could be partners living together in a home." [19:37]
"One, short, auburn colored hair, kind of the controlled mess look with an EEG, possible use of an EEG." [19:50]
"And this EEG is kind of a looks like um like a kind of a plastic head, kind of a wrap that the hair can pass through." [20:04]
"Not a helmet." [20:07]
"Uh maybe like a honeycomb kind of this the kind of lays on top of your head and your hair can kind of pass through it." [20:17]
"at a workstation." [20:19]
"And she sits on the left overlooking maybe kind of a bay windows or I don't know what the architectural term is, but there could be a view of the outside there." [20:34]
"Um, she uh her voice is present after the removal of many, it would appear to be maybe one to two layers of voice filter, a voice disguise." [20:52]
"Uh in the past, this person was controlling the conversation." [21:00]
"I found her after removing the voice filters just with no equipment, just listening, listening for the underlying voice." [21:09]
"There were male and female voices, roles and kind of a good cop, bad cop or opposing uh conversation, an adversarial conversation." [21:23]
"And when I started remove, you know, looking at the underlying voices, she was present." [21:28]
"And then I found her visually." [21:31]
"And this partner." [21:33]
"The partner has kind of the same haircut but dark hair, uh past suggestions that were made that she wears a sock in her jeans to mimic a penis." [21:47]
"And there were comments last night that paraphrasing, I'm not surprised to see these two again." [22:02]
"We were we were taken out of the conversation." [22:06]
"Look who surfaced almost immediately." [22:11]
"And so you have to be so careful." [22:14]
"So they have their story, right?" [22:17]
"And the story that that that's being shared is the accusation of Homeland Security." [22:23]
"Um, and it's easy to get confused here." [22:27]
"And so rotating my awareness with them in mind, right, with their visual in mind, possibly the presence of Asian people again observing or suggesting." [22:44]
"It's very challenging sifting through all of this information." [22:52]
"And so the drug task force next, right?" [22:55]
"Some of the suggestions that I kind of I can feel on this one." [23:02]
"Oh, before I change subject here, uh from the distance." [23:09]
"So this actually felt like it's coming from the inside." [23:14]
"Remember why we're doing this." [23:16]
"This is actual information, Sean." [23:22]
"But, uh, I'm going to see if this person, would you like to share right now and have me capture it?" [23:28]
"I mean, not really." [23:33]
"America needs to know the truth of just how far this law enforcement system use goes." [23:53]
"This is from the distance, but actually feels like it's emanating from my location." [23:58]
"Again, hearing in both places." [24:04]
"Um, nothing else to share." [24:15]
"So, here's someone making a suggestion with what I would say is heartfelt." [24:22]
"Uh, and I'll continue the response from author." [24:25]
"from a citizen's perspective and a technology worker's perspective, it's not hard to see how a system this insidious, who would have the keys, right?" [24:41]
"My my first guess would be just the military and Homeland security." [24:47]
"If a local drug task force was using it, well sure." [24:51]
"That makes sense because you would want uh oversight." [24:57]
"You would want oversight, but my concern as a citizen and a technology worker would be because of the unconsented to status, how likely is it that the absence of the publicly facing knowledge and relationship would would negatively impact their ability and desire to actually work with citizens, help citizens, right?" [25:33]
"From a business perspective, where where is the actual return on investment if you start spending money on cleaning up the damage to the community wherever it's coming from within the system." [25:51]
"There is a pattern of suggestion that is uh going back to March paraphrasing." [26:00]
"I told my supervisor about what was happening in the city of Denver and to this individual person, and they chose to to just protect me in that situation, right?" [26:17]
"And not necessarily protect the citizens." [26:23]
"So, all of this narrative, I I appreciate it and I don't want to judge anyone because if there is truth to any of this, revealing a drug task force, revealing Homeland security's unacknowledged use, right, covert use of this system, whether it's to clean up crime or not, past suggestions indicate, you know, that people feel that it creates more crime than it than it solves for." [26:58]
"Last night, there was a suggestion about this." [26:59]
"It was debated briefly at, you know, paraphrasing, how could you justify what you're doing?" [27:07]
"Uh, you know, appreciate the arrest, but in three months, that crime will return." [27:13]
"From the distance, that is exactly what I said." [27:18]
"I did not include the word that." [27:24]
"Response from author, thank you." [27:27]
"And you know, people are going to be risking their lives communicating." [27:31]
"Euthanasia hasn't really been suggested yet in this takeaway, but that was a big theme last night." [27:38]
"And that's a big theme of the why the presence of the Hangman is here." [27:43]
"Euthanasia is a threat." [27:46]
"And there were several different voices that are really standing against euthanasia in the presence of the shelter and this conversation that could be heard 24 hours a day throughout the city of Denver and throughout the early morning in the shelter." [28:07]
"From the distance right now, it's reflecting off you, Sean." [28:15]
"I want to say something about that." [28:20]
"Uh, author's going to begin the repeating process to capture this suggestion in three, two, one." [28:30]
"The countdown is very helpful." [28:35]
"I'm going to tell you why it's being heard around you." [28:45]
"You have an actual implant." [28:52]
"Why is there no reaction?" [28:59]
"I'm just going to continue." [29:06]
"The implant itself is reacting with the technology in use around you." [29:26]
"Yes, that's exactly what I said with 100% word for word accuracy." [29:38]
"How do you feel about having an implant?" [29:46]
"Don't forget to make it to your breakfast on time." [29:55]
"I would also like to say something." [30:05]
"If this person has an implant and you want to use them for your own malevolent purpose, who do you think owns the implant?" [30:27]
"Monsanto does not own the implant." [30:36]
"I just don't see a connection surfacing in any news articles." [30:49]
"Let's see what the author has to say at this point." [30:57]
"Response from the author, thank you for those suggestions." [31:02]
"So we have a few things." [31:04]
"Uh, thank you for the information about my implant reacting with the environment around me, with the technology in use." [31:14]
"I've been trying to listen closely to my body to see if there's a if there are any clues there and and uh I will start thinking about that." [31:28]
"I think it's a sort of thing that would benefit from uh an infographic or just a whiteboard session, you know, explaining it, but the general suggestion that it reflects off is uh it's helpful." [31:47]
"I will look for that." [31:48]
"How do I feel about it?" [31:50]
"Um, well, my first question would be, how many other people have an implant?" [32:02]
"It's been there's a pattern of suggestion that the majority, a large portion of America's population has been given something in their bodies, right?" [32:13]
"Going back months now." [32:15]
"It's a small pattern, but the word implant, you know, where it's shown up in conversation, but the implant suggestion itself is talked about daily." [32:29]
"Um, you know, it's not it's not uh it does not motivate me to accept euthanasia at all." [32:38]
Oct 2, 2025 — Recording 2 (09:20)
Open this recording on its own page
Audio: 20251002-092056-02.mp3
**Continuing themes and POV (Point of View) “Citizen Tech” visual information from the night before and early morning*
"File duration: 34 minutes and 46 seconds"
"From the distance paraphrase it that we are wrong about this, that we are completely wrong about why people should be offered euthanasia." [ 00:06 - 00:14 ]
"And we're not offered it, we're forced it on people from the distance." [ 00:19 - 00:22 ]
"Yes, that's my next from the author" [ 00:24 - 00:27 ]
"that yes, that's my next concern is how are they feeling about it?" [ 00:28 - 00:32 ]
"I think it's a miracle." [ 00:33 - 00:34 ]
"Technologically speaking," [ 00:35 - 00:36 ]
"I'm very happy with the method of communication" [ 00:37 - 00:40 ]
"and it's very easy to separate out uh human behavior from a method of communication." [ 00:41 - 00:48 ]
"It in my opinion, it's like receiving a crank phone call, like a crank zoom call" [ 00:49 - 00:55 ]
"at my desk that I can't escape and there's literally some faces there" [ 00:56 - 00:59 ]
"and they're trying to force me to kill myself violently." [ 01:01 - 01:04 ]
"Right?" [ 01:06 - 01:06 ]
"They're talking to other people around me." [ 01:07 - 01:08 ]
"Other people are going through this same Zoom call" [ 01:09 - 01:11 ]
"and they're I'm so proud of the shelter fending off these requests to murder me," [ 01:12 - 01:18 ]
"to beat me up, to assault me in the shower." [ 01:19 - 01:22 ]
"I'm very proud of the human beings around me that are choosing to stay out of trouble and not hurt the people around them." [ 01:24 - 01:32 ]
"Um, so that's how I feel about it." [ 01:34 - 01:36 ]
"What there was a last a last suggestion." [ 01:37 - 01:39 ]
"Um" [ 01:41 - 01:41 ]
"It'll come back to me in a moment." [ 01:55 - 01:56 ]
"From the distance, we did not find out what the the last thing was." [ 02:12 - 02:16 ]
"My apologies." [ 02:17 - 02:17 ]
"Uh from the distance, how are we going to get this person to accept euthanasia?" [ 02:18 - 02:23 ]
"Uh." [ 02:24 - 02:25 ]
"Oh, there's that zoom call." [ 02:27 - 02:28 ]
"violence again that's" [ 02:30 - 02:31 ]
"Um, so I'm I'm going to return to uh themes from the night and wrap up this this recording." [ 02:33 - 02:40 ]
"It will be in the document later today." [ 02:40 - 02:42 ]
"Uh" [ 02:44 - 02:44 ]
"From the distance paraphrasing," [ 02:56 - 02:58 ]
"how you suggested your feeling about the implant is really" [ 03:00 - 03:04 ]
"helping us change direction." [ 03:07 - 03:09 ]
"We understand that people may be fine to communicate now." [ 03:16 - 03:19 ]
"So" [ 03:22 - 03:22 ]
"from the distance, who is behind this implant?" [ 03:26 - 03:29 ]
"This is why I want to send him to a university as soon as humanly possible." [ 03:37 - 03:41 ]
"Let's see if they could find something and if they can't, we'll move him to a different location." [ 03:54 - 04:00 ]
"I would like to begin that process as soon as humanly possible." [ 04:06 - 04:10 ]
"Are you happy with that suggestion?" [ 04:17 - 04:19 ]
"Response from the author, absolutely." [ 04:20 - 04:22 ]
"And I this feels" [ 04:24 - 04:25 ]
"like the natural progression" [ 04:27 - 04:29 ]
"that would happen in this situation, reminding us all of the the timeline that is surfacing through the suggestions" [ 04:31 - 04:40 ]
"uh that have been made over the last six months." [ 04:41 - 04:44 ]
"Right?" [ 04:45 - 04:45 ]
"Esoteric beginnings." [ 04:46 - 04:47 ]
"We all are going to pass through, most of us." [ 04:48 - 04:50 ]
"We actually don't know that. This is quite an assumption" [ 04:51 - 04:53 ]
"because agnostic people may believe this is technology immediately." [ 04:54 - 04:59 ]
"If you do not believe in the spirit world, well then maybe technology is what people assume right out of the gate, right?" [ 04:59 - 05:07 ]
"So everyone's going to get through that initial shock and awe" [ 05:08 - 05:12 ]
"and then we've possibly arrived at what would be the public awareness of the use of technology and" [ 05:13 - 05:20 ]
"the oversight awareness of just kind of the use of uh this technology to" [ 05:22 - 05:29 ]
"cleanse America of criminal activity" [ 05:30 - 05:32 ]
"and where" [ 05:34 - 05:34 ]
"some new crime may have surfaced the threat of euthanasia" [ 05:36 - 05:40 ]
"and the suggestion of a terrorist attack, the presence of these communicators" [ 05:42 - 05:48 ]
"that uh no one can account for," [ 05:49 - 05:51 ]
"right, who are also attempting to euthanize people," [ 05:54 - 05:57 ]
"adding people to the youthanization list aggressively every day and asking for" [ 05:58 - 06:04 ]
"others maybe possibly them asking for acknowledgement or we want things to go back uh paraphrasing a recent suggestion, we want things to go back to the way it was" [ 06:04 - 06:17 ]
"before the use of this technology" [ 06:19 - 06:22 ]
"and uh unless you can offer consent." [ 06:24 - 06:26 ]
"And" [ 06:28 - 06:28 ]
"so within this timeline, you know, maybe the next progression is is that a handful of citizens who are being attacked," [ 06:30 - 06:38 ]
"used as a platform, you know, maybe that platform benefits from moving them to a university setting" [ 06:39 - 06:47 ]
"and determining whether or not the existing equipment" [ 06:48 - 06:51 ]
"uh scanning devices, things of that nature can" [ 06:52 - 06:54 ]
"surface what's inside of me if anything at all." [ 06:55 - 06:59 ]
"My assumption has always been that" [ 07:00 - 07:02 ]
"this is a stand-alone equipment." [ 07:04 - 07:06 ]
"I mean," [ 07:07 - 07:07 ]
"the gravity, the ramifications of implants being put in people" [ 07:09 - 07:13 ]
"that will take the greatest uh the highest level of of analysis and leadership to navigate public sentiment, wouldn't it?" [ 07:16 - 07:28 ]
"From the distance, absolutely, people will be furious about that." [ 07:33 - 07:37 ]
"Let's get moving on this everybody from the distance." [ 07:43 - 07:46 ]
"I want to wrap up this recording." [ 07:48 - 07:50 ]
"Thank you for the collaboration." [ 07:51 - 07:53 ]
"Paraphrasing from the distance, I do believe we are in a period of public awareness and we are on our way to a finish line in this situation so to speak." [ 08:06 - 08:19 ]
"From the distance, thank you for reminding us that there is a path forward, Sean Christopher Harris." [ 08:27 - 08:34 ]
"response from author, yes, you're welcome." [ 08:35 - 08:38 ]
"It's uh there's a path there regardless of if we acknowledge it." [ 08:38 - 08:42 ]
"uh in my technology career, I remind people whether or not they acknowledge experimentation" [ 08:43 - 08:49 ]
"personally or professionally with a process" [ 08:50 - 08:52 ]
"and they're measuring, there is an experiment happening." [ 08:53 - 08:56 ]
"It's there's causality present and there are outcomes present from your your decision making." [ 08:57 - 09:04 ]
"It's very important to acknowledge it." [ 09:05 - 09:07 ]
"Acknowledging it provides you with with control," [ 09:08 - 09:11 ]
"uh perception that you may not have had before when you're just moving towards a target." [ 09:12 - 09:17 ]
"Measuring is so important." [ 09:18 - 09:20 ]
"Um, continuing responses from author," [ 09:22 - 09:24 ]
"From the distance, exactly. paraphrasing exactly where there you acknowledge it or not, you're on that journey." [ 09:34 - 09:40 ]
"paraphrasing additional suggestions from the distance attempted to control that journey is not advisable in this situation" [ 09:51 - 10:00 ]
"with euthanization." [ 10:03 - 10:04 ]
"That is not sustainable and the hangman's noose is coming, everybody." [ 10:13 - 10:18 ]
"Uh, response from author, it it's very challenging to deal with kind of the excitement in the moment that I feel emanating from this connection, this conversation," [ 10:22 - 10:34 ]
"right? The connection to the conversation, remember," [ 10:35 - 10:38 ]
"the there's a a milestone coming" [ 10:40 - 10:42 ]
"and it's going to bring this very relief." [ 10:44 - 10:47 ]
"If you're feeling excitement in this moment for an explanation," [ 10:48 - 10:52 ]
"an explanation of any kind, uh excitement or or any kind of positive energy from collaborating on something that is direction, just getting getting to acknowledgement, imagine what acknowledgement will feel like for so many people." [ 10:54 - 11:13 ]
"This explanation that what you've been listening to and what you have been experiencing, there's there's a lot of darkness there," [ 11:14 - 11:22 ]
"but in the background, maybe America was doing amazing work." [ 11:24 - 11:28 ]
"And some things will not be undone," [ 11:30 - 11:32 ]
"but now there's peace of mind that we're moving towards the human experience explanation that the citizens are waiting for." [ 11:34 - 11:42 ]
"right?" [ 11:43 - 11:44 ]
"And this will, hopefully, I could tell you from my perspective, it will bring a great deal of peace to me, this explanation," [ 11:45 - 11:52 ]
"regardless of it ends my of if it ends my life or not, I will walk boldly into an opportunity as will others and uh the explanation will bring will bring some peace." [ 11:53 - 12:07 ]
"And for others, the suggestion of the hangman, please, please stop euthanizing people." [ 12:08 - 12:13 ]
"If you're listening to this conversation and you you know, you feel like you've made mistakes," [ 12:15 - 12:22 ]
"you know, why is that?" [ 12:23 - 12:24 ]
"Are you doing the bidding of a stranger?" [ 12:24 - 12:27 ]
"I mean, there could be intelligence community workers operating in the context of this counter narrative to pressure us into acknowledgement." [ 12:29 - 12:38 ]
"That's a suggestion and they're walking a path that is much higher and there is not going to be, you know, there's no reward in person for those people per se." [ 12:39 - 12:51 ]
"I mean, that kind of work is thankless in a lot of ways." [ 12:52 - 12:55 ]
"Hey, that's a question I would have." [ 12:56 - 12:57 ]
"Would it I won't ask anyone to answer it." [ 12:58 - 13:02 ]
"Exactly, Sean from the distance." [ 13:05 - 13:07 ]
"Uh, so I need to pause for a moment and make sure I've gotten everything." [ 13:08 - 13:12 ]
"So to summarize, let's do it that way." [ 13:13 - 13:15 ]
"The no consent conversation is present." [ 13:16 - 13:18 ]
"The threat of euthanization is present in that conversation." [ 13:18 - 13:22 ]
"The spirituality narrative is debated at least a few times a day by by a few people, but not nearly at the volume it was in February or March." [ 13:23 - 13:35 ]
"The defense has grown." [ 13:36 - 13:38 ]
"The volume of conversation itself feels about 50% or more defense of the city of Denver and growing" [ 13:38 - 13:50 ]
"versus what I was experiencing in February to be mostly uh the threat of euthanization and the so-called ugly workflows, the psychological warfare" [ 13:52 - 14:03 ]
"attack attacking those that have been cited for communicating." [ 14:04 - 14:08 ]
"Um, the presence of drugs uh being individually being suggested receiving these suggestions, the offer of drugs and an opportunity, you know, accepts assistance from the uh youthzation people, it really doesn't read any different to me than you must accept youthzation." [ 14:10 - 14:32 ]
"We also have uh comments coming from the direction of what you may call biotech," [ 14:34 - 14:40 ]
"saying that we, you know, I really want to call this out just now in this conversation." [ 14:41 - 14:47 ]
"We've we'd you know, paraphrasing, you're you're suggestion on how you feel about having the implant is helping us change direction." [ 14:48 - 15:02 ]
"and historically, you know, getting to this question at the end, I I'll prompt it that everyone with this question possibly, but" [ 15:06 - 15:16 ]
"moving through Homeland security is still being accused." [ 15:18 - 15:20 ]
"There's a heartfelt response from that." [ 15:21 - 15:23 ]
"Um, we have the news article from this morning I suggested, you know, aligning with past conversation around the suggestion of retaliation for uh maybe one of Israel's troops or what the uh 8200," [ 15:25 - 15:44 ]
"right? capturing Palestinian phone call data using artificial intelligence." [ 15:47 - 15:52 ]
"Are they accessing the brains of Palestinians and storing that data?" [ 15:54 - 16:02 ]
"Right?" [ 16:04 - 16:04 ]
"All data for almost any app in the world, by the way, is stored on Microsoft Azure servers or AWS, Amazon web services." [ 16:05 - 16:15 ]
"And so, you know, I'm going to look into at the Amazon story, maybe there is an Amazon presence in this conversation." [ 16:17 - 16:25 ]
"Many people could be listening according to Nita Farahani, there are thousands of technology organizations in this domain that is BCIs, artificial intelligence," [ 16:29 - 16:41 ]
"right?" [ 16:42 - 16:42 ]
"Um I think that's it for this recording." [ 16:49 - 16:52 ]
"I want to end with this one last question, so and it's important to understand in the context of euthanization," [ 16:54 - 17:01 ]
"the unconsented to conversation, right?" [ 17:02 - 17:05 ]
"Can if law enforcement is using this system to cleanse America of criminal activity," [ 17:06 - 17:13 ]
"do they really need something like the spirituality narrative?" [ 17:15 - 17:18 ]
"Does that belong to them?" [ 17:19 - 17:20 ]
"Does that belong to them in this instance, this experience Denver's having?" [ 17:22 - 17:27 ]
"Can they still do their job in a consented to context?" [ 17:28 - 17:33 ]
"From the distance, sure they can." [ 17:37 - 17:38 ]
"Sure they can, a passionate sure they can." [ 17:39 - 17:41 ]
"Right?" [ 17:42 - 17:42 ]
"And another question in the context of euthanizations and I'll record any answers if if people want there's two." [ 17:43 - 17:51 ]
"So, can law enforcement operate with with consent to the conversation?" [ 17:52 - 17:58 ]
"And the other one is, why would Homeland security, Microsoft and um Monsanto be euthanizing people using the military advisor policy around classical telepathy." [ 17:59 - 18:19 ]
"What does classical telepathy have to do with Microsoft, Monsanto, and Homeland Security?" [ 18:21 - 18:28 ]
"Right?" [ 18:31 - 18:31 ]
"Are we experiencing classical telepathy?" [ 18:32 - 18:34 ]
"So those are two questions and that's kind of that's based on the historical, both are based on the historical conversation and that's the majority of it really in the second question." [ 18:35 - 18:48 ]
"So, the first question is, and remember, this is all of this needs to be substantiated." [ 18:50 - 18:55 ]
"This citizen tech communication is not a replacement for physical evidence." [ 18:56 - 19:02 ]
"at least from the point of view of a citizen who's trying to make sense of it all, right?" [ 19:05 - 19:08 ]
"And other people attempting to join in the conversation and make sense of it all." [ 19:09 - 19:14 ]
"So, the first question is, can, if this suggestion that there is homeland security and law enforcement use of this so-called citizen technology to free America of of criminal enterprise, some of the really nasty stuff, too." [ 19:17 - 19:34 ]
"I mean, they're making sweeping arrests." [ 19:35 - 19:37 ]
"I'm curious what the what the growth is in the amount of arrests compared to five years ago." [ 19:38 - 19:45 ]
"Right?" [ 19:47 - 19:47 ]
"So can this work, this important work happen within a a consented to conversation?" [ 19:47 - 19:54 ]
"From the distance, it will have to." [ 19:58 - 20:00 ]
"Plus plus one from that." [ 20:00 - 20:02 ]
"Plus one on that from the author." [ 20:03 - 20:05 ]
"It will absolutely have to everybody." [ 20:09 - 20:12 ]
"You're missing some information." [ 20:16 - 20:17 ]
"The other question and then I will I will uh capture that information is, what does the so-called, the suggested military advisor policy around the use of classical telepathy have to do with the organizations being mentioned?" [ 20:18 - 20:36 ]
"Homeland security, Microsoft, and Monsanto." [ 20:37 - 20:41 ]
"Right?" [ 20:43 - 20:43 ]
"What does it have to do?" [ 20:44 - 20:45 ]
"This is around the policy for euthanizing people that if you're exposed to telepathic communication or you communicate, you you are you're dead." [ 20:46 - 20:58 ]
"You're you're added to the euthanization list and you begin experiencing these violent psychological workflows." [ 20:58 - 21:09 ]
"Would anyone like to comment on that?" [ 21:09 - 21:10 ]
"And then I will get to this other piece of information." [ 21:11 - 21:14 ]
"From the distance they don't at surface level." [ 21:20 - 21:22 ]
"I mean, that is really insightful, isn't it, everybody, from the distance?" [ 21:29 - 21:33 ]
"Yes, it is really insightful." [ 21:36 - 21:38 ]
"Paraphrasing from the distance, we cannot continue this direction and especially not with this individual." [ 21:48 - 21:54 ]
"So the answers to the two questions, at least from uh you know, the one minute few seconds of responses," [ 21:58 - 22:06 ]
"the first question, yes, of course they can operate do this same important work, you know, within a consented to conversation." [ 22:07 - 22:15 ]
"And the second question, no, it it doesn't make sense that any of these organizations would have anything to do with a policy of euthanization for classical telepathy," [ 22:17 - 22:29 ]
"right? This communicating." [ 22:32 - 22:34 ]
"So, the information that was uh this is an incredible recording from the distance." [ 22:36 - 22:46 ]
"Yes, this one had had strong collaboration." [ 22:47 - 22:49 ]
"They're they're becoming that way." [ 22:50 - 22:52 ]
"Uh a very grateful, regardless of what happens to me, I'm I am proud to communicate alongside these unknown people" [ 22:54 - 23:03 ]
"and regardless of what side of the uh adversarial situation you're in," [ 23:05 - 23:12 ]
"it's a starting point, a bloody starting point, isn't it?" [ 23:14 - 23:18 ]
"We will learn this method of communication and it will uh I believe it will heal it will heal so many people" [ 23:20 - 23:29 ]
"when we move towards acknowledgement, it will really free up the people who are you know, quoted someone yesterday, we are expected, paraphrasing, we are expected to euthanize people" [ 23:30 - 23:43 ]
"and then we are expected to take these assignments as if they don't have a choice." [ 23:44 - 23:51 ]
"From the distance, free us of this burden." [ 24:00 - 24:02 ]
"Please, free us of this situation." [ 24:03 - 24:07 ]
"That is exactly what I'm talking about." [ 24:08 - 24:11 ]
"Uh from the response from the author from that heartfelt plea for someone to to be free to the situation, that is exactly what I'm talking about." [ 24:12 - 24:22 ]
"The hangman is disappointed from the distance." [ 24:27 - 24:29 ]
"You should never euthanize people like this." [ 24:34 - 24:36 ]
"so much suffering in this conversation and I really do feel it coming from every side." [ 24:38 - 24:45 ]
"Uh So, getting me to that university may actually really free people immediately of uh it it's not just that, the acknowledgement, quoted someone from yesterday, uh a suggestion from yesterday, paraphrasing, acknowledgement will change the expectations around what we do." [ 24:48 - 25:12 ]
"We we may no longer be expected to do this." [ 25:12 - 25:15 ]
"So, this other information uh that was suggested, let me know if I get this right because you did not share it." [ 25:21 - 25:26 ]
"Uh not all the way." [ 25:28 - 25:29 ]
"Uh the presence of Asian people in these conversations uh at night in America, it's daytime overseas, right?" [ 25:31 - 25:39 ]
"It could explain a lot a lot of this conversation, but the suggestion of Asian participants, I always get this seed." [ 25:40 - 25:48 ]
"It's like an office setting, stools and people spending time on the stools communicating." [ 25:48 - 25:54 ]
"Um they were not in favor of euthanization." [ 25:55 - 25:57 ]
"They were defending the American citizens last night." [ 25:59 - 26:01 ]
"Who are these, who are these people being suggested?" [ 26:02 - 26:05 ]
"Was that the information?" [ 26:05 - 26:07 ]
"From the distance, yes, and I want to add something." [ 26:10 - 26:13 ]
"Those were college students." [ 26:20 - 26:21 ]
"That was communist academia, Sean." [ 26:21 - 26:24 ]
"And they really appreciate your perspective in this situation." [ 26:31 - 26:34 ]
"And they are not a fan of the unconsented to conversation from the author, yes, I I do recall that from the last 12 hours" [ 26:39 - 26:48 ]
"and it was also the um uh the unconsented to conversation uh it just it just eluded me." [ 26:50 - 27:01 ]
"Oh, bottlenecking investments was mentioned." [ 27:02 - 27:04 ]
"that people have looked into uh, you know, this question, are consumer application telepathic uh communication for consumer application is being bottlenecked according to more than one suggestion in the last 12 hours and I believe from that group, is that your understanding from the distance?" [ 27:06 - 27:32 ]
"Yes, that was the other part of it." [ 27:35 - 27:36 ]
"This is so important everybody." [ 27:44 - 27:46 ]
"I think that's good for this recording." [ 27:47 - 27:48 ]
"I think I need to take a break and a moment of silence maybe for anyone suffering this situation." [ 27:50 - 27:58 ]
"There's a news article about um a synagogue in the UK suffering a violent attack." [ 27:58 - 28:06 ]
"A moment of silence for for the suffering in the city of Denver, other cities have been mentioned historically," [ 28:08 - 28:17 ]
"and uh the conflict in the Middle East." [ 28:19 - 28:21 ]
"Um Someone suggested this morning, I really maybe ending on this as far as a moment of silence, paraphrasing, I'm so tired of religious ideals fueling the the war economy or the the the global conflict." [ 28:24 - 28:41 ]
"From the distance that exactly what I suggested." [ 28:44 - 28:46 ]
"So I'm going to end this recording." [ 28:47 - 28:49 ]
"It's 10:22 a.m." [ 28:49 - 28:50 ]
"From the distance telepathy could really help us see suffering like never before." [ 28:58 - 29:04 ]
"Uh that is all from the author, that is also becoming a theme." [ 29:04 - 29:08 ]
"Thank you for that." [ 29:08 - 29:09 ]
"It it I'm not sure but this is one of the more redeeming qualities of telepathy." [ 29:11 - 29:16 ]
"It's not just that you could see suffering, but I have this gutteral response to want to just root it out." [ 29:17 - 29:24 ]
"The utilitarian perspective that that I've, you know, come to to love from my career path and my self-development work, it does not require religious ideals, sexual identity," [ 29:25 - 29:41 ]
"it just it's utility." [ 29:42 - 29:43 ]
"If you see someone suffering, I I just it's it's repulsive and I want to help the person." [ 29:44 - 29:51 ]
"Does telepathy and maybe this is a question to think about with the silence here, does telepathy not only help us see suffering," [ 29:52 - 30:00 ]
"but provide us with this soul level, this fundamental desire to help other people." [ 30:01 - 30:07 ]
"There's a love for this connection that that surpasses any kind of racism, all of this psychological violence that is being facilitated has only made me love people and maybe more empathetic towards people." [ 30:10 - 30:29 ]
"Exactly the opposite." [ 30:31 - 30:32 ]
"What is it that this connection of consciousness that has to be spiritual our ability to measure our essence, the truth of who we are." [ 30:34 - 30:43 ]
"Maybe there's an underlying motivation being provided to just care for each other like never before." [ 30:44 - 30:52 ]
"What do you think of that?" [ 30:53 - 30:54 ]
"I'm I'm going to make that the last question, everybody." [ 30:55 - 30:58 ]
"Beginning repeating, continuing repeating in three, two, one." [ 30:58 - 31:04 ]
"Why don't you go talk to those" [ 31:10 - 31:12 ]
"We need you to find assistance, Sean." [ 31:16 - 31:18 ]
"I actually want to say something about what you have suggested." [ 31:24 - 31:27 ]
"The world of opposites is happening to all of us at the Pentagon." [ 31:40 - 31:44 ]
"Yes, that is exactly what I said with word for word accuracy." [ 31:50 - 31:54 ]
"And that should align with your suggestion." [ 32:00 - 32:02 ]
"response from the author author, it actually does." [ 32:02 - 32:05 ]
"It absolutely does." [ 32:05 - 32:06 ]
"That is what I'm talking about." [ 32:07 - 32:09 ]
"I think it's that telepathy reveals additional information that maybe it reveals additional information that we did not have before" [ 32:10 - 32:19 ]
"and it's going to help us in the end if we let it." [ 32:21 - 32:23 ]
"And it does present a world of opposites." [ 32:25 - 32:27 ]
"Uh continuing the repeating process for one last time. Uh well, I'm going to address the other suggestion." [ 32:29 - 32:36 ]
"I'm avoiding human relationships until I find support from people who can support me and who are aware of the danger around me in granular detail, in enough detail that they are not going to endanger my life or their life doing the bidding of a stranger." [ 32:36 - 32:57 ]
"So the greatest thing I could do for those people is stay away from them." [ 32:58 - 33:02 ]
"From the distance, I understand, Sean." [ 33:06 - 33:08 ]
"And I'm so sorry for this." [ 33:09 - 33:11 ]
"response from author, I'm so sorry for this." [ 33:11 - 33:13 ]
"It is absolutely heartbreaking and it is, you know, you pair that up with the suggestion that that people are attempting to euthanize me and it's going to be forced on me very soon." [ 33:14 - 33:25 ]
"Every day, you know, I center myself in in preparation for losing my life that day and I need to do that today." [ 33:26 - 33:34 ]
"Um I'm going to end the recording now." [ 33:36 - 33:38 ]
"uh and center myself." [ 33:42 - 33:43 ]
"Thank you for your service, America." [ 33:44 - 33:46 ]
"Thank you for your service any country that is coming to the city of Denver's aid in this moment." [ 33:47 - 33:53 ]
"I refuse to believe that any technology organization, intelligence community or law enforcement organization would invite a police brutality story of this caliber or would invite the threat of euthanization." [ 33:54 - 34:12 ]
"From the distance, the hangman's coming everybody." [ 34:15 - 34:17 ]
"And and they're very disappointed." [ 34:22 - 34:24 ]
"It's 10:28 a.m." [ 34:25 - 34:26 ]
"We're just over one hour, one hour and seven minutes on the recording." [ 34:27 - 34:31 ]
"This is the voice of Sean Christopher Harris," [ 34:32 - 34:34 ]
"the author, the reluctant author, but also a proud author of the discovery of telepathic terrorism." [ 34:35 - 34:44 ]
"End of recording." [ 34:45 - 34:46 ]
Oct 2, 2025 — Recording 3 (12:30)
Open this recording on its own page
Audio: 20251002-123046.mp3
**12:30pm, capturing an unidentified communicator's request on possible law enforcement use of the so-called “Citizen Tech” technology. Who holds the keys to the “Citizen Tech” conversation and possible has influence over the so-called euthanization “ugly workflows” in Denver, CO.? Remember, the “Citizen Tech” conversation needs to be substantiated, doesn’t it?*
"File duration: 1 minutes and 29 seconds"
"It's 12:30 p.m. Thursday, October 2nd, 2025." [ 00:01 - 00:07 ]
"Um, something came to mind, uh from the distance a request to uh capture this and include it in today's um journal entries." [ 00:10 - 00:27 ]
"So, thinking about just where we are in the conversation or where we are in this journey, right?" [ 00:27 - 00:34 ]
"Esoteric beginnings, public uh oversight awareness, right, public awareness of the use of technology, oversight awareness of possibly crime surfacing that needs to be dealt with." [ 00:35 - 00:54 ]
"Last night, last night the suggestion of drugs continued to be offered in an attempt to lure me out of the building, right?" [ 00:54 - 01:08 ]
"And uh a suggestion of a drug task force, narcotics task force, that also accusations suggested around homeland security's role in it." [ 01:08 - 01:21 ]
"There's an important event uh going back possibly a month now, approximately a month." [ 01:21 - 01:29 ]
"Um telepathic visual information suggests an office setting with Caucasian people, maybe a few people of color." [ 01:31 - 01:42 ]
"These are adults, physically fit people." [ 01:42 - 01:46 ]
"There is one in particular medium to long, shoulder, you know, shoulder length blonde hair, masculine football player type, very stocky." [ 01:47 - 01:59 ]
"From the distance, that's Captain Reynolds, Sean." [ 02:01 - 02:04 ]
"He's Denver Police Department." [ 02:05 - 02:08 ]
"So, this person occasionally wears a ball cap, a t-shirt, shorts." [ 02:08 - 02:16 ]
"There's a mental image of him holding a little pair of gold keys." [ 02:16 - 02:20 ]
"There was an evening one night when there was a very friendly conversation." [ 02:21 - 02:26 ]
"These how I found these people, it was a night like any other, predatory positioning, uh the suggestion of euthanization." [ 02:27 - 02:38 ]
"And so I connected to them using the ears, nose, mouth, right, to move my consciousness inside of them just like this other workflow that is uh attacks us in the restroom while we're sitting down on the toilet using the other side of the body while we exert ourselves to hide their presence." [ 02:38 - 03:04 ]
"So I found these people in a moment, another night of tormenting, connected with them and they began uh the suggestion is is that they began experiencing a connection to my body, right?" [ 03:05 - 03:20 ]
"And so for about 24 hours uh this continued on, the end of which a friendly conversation began." [ 03:21 - 03:31 ]
"They spoke of an amplifier, the suggestion of this this male figure with the blonde hair spoke of an amplifier, equipment and how he held the keys." [ 03:31 - 03:44 ]
"He held the keys in this city." [ 03:44 - 03:46 ]
"to the citizen technology, what we're experiencing." [ 03:47 - 03:51 ]
"And there's an image of him." [ 03:51 - 03:53 ]
"I'm thinking of it now." [ 03:54 - 03:55 ]
"There was an attempt at a friendship." [ 03:56 - 03:58 ]
"The suggestion was he'd set me up with some assistance." [ 03:59 - 04:03 ]
"And then I I let them go." [ 04:04 - 04:10 ]
"I ejected everybody and nothing got better." [ 04:10 - 04:14 ]
"But that night, the night of the friendly conversation, when support was suggested, and this is very important." [ 04:15 - 04:22 ]
"He held up the keys and moments later, uh I think it was before, I was being attacked verbally in the building and the building could hear it, right?" [ 04:23 - 04:34 ]
"At the 48th Street shelter." [ 04:34 - 04:35 ]
"And out of nowhere, it stopped." [ 04:36 - 04:38 ]
"The suggestion was he made a phone call, it stopped, and then they went to another person in the other dormitory, the steamboat dormitory." [ 04:39 - 04:50 ]
"I'm in Evergreen's Melville something." [ 04:50 - 04:54 ]
"The voice, the voices that I've been experiencing, this malevolent and uh just violent psychological experience all this picking and and the so-called youthanization ugly war uh workflows where they attack someone verbally, stopped attacking me and it went and started attacking someone else in the other room." [ 04:55 - 05:21 ]
"And the suggestion was he was a homeland security worker, Melville, something uh was his name, but they called his name out." [ 05:21 - 05:33 ]
"the suggestion was he was a homeland security worker that was murdering people for communicating." [ 05:33 - 05:40 ]
"And the suggestion was that night, now we're going in the right direction." [ 05:41 - 05:45 ]
"Right?" [ 05:46 - 05:46 ]
"And I was very happy in that moment, but also concerned." [ 05:47 - 05:51 ]
"I I couldn't believe that the whole conversation stopped attacking me and started attacking this other person in the other dormitory." [ 05:51 - 05:59 ]
"And we're all listening to it." [ 06:00 - 06:02 ]
"And then within about 12 hours, I was back in the crosshairs and a new figure showed up." [ 06:03 - 06:14 ]
"And this figure was another Caucasian male, looks like a bodybuilder with a shaved head and a goatee." [ 06:15 - 06:22 ]
"And this other person with the long hair that said they held the keys was kind of they were still in the conversation." [ 06:22 - 06:30 ]
"These two, I believe, share the same office space." [ 06:30 - 06:34 ]
"There was, you know, and so that person attempted to uh to communicate with me and some of the suggestions that ensued were really really terrifying." [ 06:35 - 06:48 ]
"Uh just briefly, I mean, I don't really want to get it get into that right now, but the suggestion was that he had strangled somebody that he wrapped, pulled a blanket over someone's head that he was using to connect with me and strangled them with a belt around the neckline." [ 06:51 - 07:09 ]
"And that was all part, you know, that was some of the information that was returned." [ 07:10 - 07:14 ]
"And so, you know, what what uh what is going on here, right?" [ 07:15 - 07:19 ]
"I want to pull this back to this suggestion of the keys." [ 07:19 - 07:22 ]
"He holds the keys to this experience and the ability to pull the danger away from me and put it on someone else and get the conversation going in the right direction." [ 07:23 - 07:38 ]
"Later, uh after I completely denied this other bodybuilder type person with the shaved head for a period of approximately one week, an attempt was made by that person before, you know, I denied every single offer." [ 07:40 - 07:54 ]
"They kept suggesting drugs, homosexual opportunities, right?" [ 07:55 - 08:00 ]
"I kept reminding them the whole time that this is a public safety crisis and an unconsented to conversation." [ 08:00 - 08:07 ]
"So, someone's making a suggestion in this conversation that the long-haired gentleman is Captain Reynolds from the Denver Police Department." [ 08:08 - 08:17 ]
"I've Googled that." [ 08:18 - 08:18 ]
"I don't find anything, but then again, is anything listed?" [ 08:19 - 08:24 ]
"You know, maybe listing the faces of these people, if we're going to have a this new technology would be very important, but" [ 08:24 - 08:33 ]
"later, this long-haired gentleman, I say within the last two weeks, suggestion of him approaching a a person of color with a pistol, asking that person of color to kill me, pointing me out." [ 08:34 - 08:49 ]
"That conversation was observed and shared with everyone." [ 08:49 - 08:52 ]
"I haven't heard anything from this bodybuilder type guy with the shaved head, but who are these two people?" [ 08:52 - 08:58 ]
"Again, as a citizen, I refuse to believe that the Denver Police Department would invite such a horrible police brutality story." [ 08:58 - 09:09 ]
"This unconsented to conversation and the technology itself being used to psychologically punish people and force them into accepting euthanization." [ 09:10 - 09:21 ]
"This office space that they shared had the same workstations that I see other people using with POV access, point of view video access to people possibly." [ 09:21 - 09:33 ]
"Point of view video of people's eyes in real time." [ 09:34 - 09:38 ]
"so you could connect with me using this computer station." [ 09:38 - 09:42 ]
"It looks like an old Pac-Man game or something, but I think the point of it is that it's a locked container that holds the computer." [ 09:42 - 09:50 ]
"So, you know, that is that uh question from the author for other people, is that exactly what you wanted me to share?" [ 09:53 - 10:04 ]
"Uh I'm going to listen now and repeat in three, two, one." [ 10:05 - 10:11 ]
"From the distance, yes, that is what I wanted you to share." [ 10:15 - 10:19 ]
"Okay, Sean, that's the recorded." [ 10:22 - 10:25 ]
"so uh, I'm going to end the recording here and get to work." [ 10:26 - 10:30 ]
"And uh remember, um, the intersection, the shelter, all of these locations, I'm documenting, I'm documenting the uh transcripts, capturing transcripts to measure whether or not support has shown up yet." [ 10:31 - 10:49 ]
"Nothing has changed from my individual situation yet or the people being added to the youthanization list." [ 10:49 - 10:56 ]
"That's still happening." [ 10:56 - 10:57 ]
"So, thank you for your service uh for anyone that's attempting to resolve this situation, maybe just bringing improving the awareness overall." [ 10:58 - 11:09 ]
"That could be the phase we're in, but time the clock is ticking, so to speak." [ 11:09 - 11:15 ]
"And how important is my testimony?" [ 11:16 - 11:18 ]
"There is a difference between an individual being, you know, uh called, what's the word?" [ 11:19 - 11:26 ]
"An individual being uh attacked, right?" [ 11:26 - 11:31 ]
"Being forced to accept euthanization in the general population." [ 11:32 - 11:35 ]
"That was suggested this morning." [ 11:36 - 11:37 ]
"Think about how rapidly this is spreading." [ 11:38 - 11:40 ]
"The suggestion is, I mean, there's 30 to 50 conservatively people being added to the euthanization list." [ 11:41 - 11:48 ]
"And then through that violent psychological warfare and the volume of conversation that is suppressing the person, uh attacking the person verbally and suppressing them by attacking the people around them verbally, it spreads euthanization in itself." [ 11:48 - 12:09 ]
"Telepathic communication is a method of communication." [ 12:10 - 12:13 ]
"The spread of euthanization is psychological warfare happening on American soil." [ 12:15 - 12:21 ]
"and I am not the one facilitating that." [ 12:22 - 12:26 ]
"Remember, never stop your life if you become singled out, singled out is the word I was looking for." [ 12:27 - 12:35 ]
"Do what you can." [ 12:36 - 12:37 ]
"I would instruct anyone to take notes, take transcripts, but if you do, you could invite a much worse situation." [ 12:37 - 12:44 ]
"Know that." [ 12:44 - 12:45 ]
"Um it's 12:43 p.m. Thursday, October 2nd, 2025." [ 12:46 - 12:52 ]
"End of recording." [ 12:52 - 12:54 ]
Oct 2, 2025 — Recording 4 (12:49)
Open this recording on its own page
Audio: 20251002-124904.mp3
**12:49pm, exploring the pattern of suggestion that we are all experiencing “a world of opposites” and how considering aligning ourselves with the Japanese philosophy of Kaizen may help us move forward in our journey towards acknowledgement without punishing each other organizationally, where applicable and individually.*
"File duration: 1 minutes and 26 seconds"
"It is 12:49 p.m., Thursday, October 2nd, 2025." [ 00:02 - 00:08 ]
"This is Sean Christopher Harris, the author of The Discovery of Telepathic Terrorism in Denver, Colorado, 2024 to 2025." [ 00:08 - 00:21 ]
"However, it could include Portland and and go as far as far back as 2020." [ 00:22 - 00:29 ]
"Maybe even Denver in 2019 before I went to Portland." [ 00:29 - 00:36 ]
"But I wanted to do a recording uh this one I'll call the world of opposites." [ 00:37 - 00:44 ]
"The world of opposites." [ 00:45 - 00:47 ]
"Everything that you would think would be the right thing to do, it seems to yield suggestions that it that it isn't a good thing to do." [ 00:47 - 01:01 ]
"I want to see how many of those things I can come up with in 15 minutes." [ 01:01 - 01:07 ]
"I want to see." [ 01:08 - 01:09 ]
"I'm just going to listen right now." [ 01:09 - 01:10 ]
"Maybe I'll get us started." [ 01:11 - 01:12 ]
"And uh this may this is going to be just kind of controversial." [ 01:13 - 01:19 ]
"is my assumption." [ 01:20 - 01:22 ]
"Um for this recording, if you're listening in the distance, what I would say is try and put your experimentation hat on and that uh think about how subjective truth is depending on the audience." [ 01:23 - 01:42 ]
"Right?" [ 01:42 - 01:43 ]
"Good and evil for one." [ 01:43 - 01:44 ]
"And uh what was this thing I used to say?" [ 01:47 - 01:49 ]
"If both sides think they're right, right?" [ 01:51 - 01:57 ]
"If both sides think they're right, they're just in their actions." [ 01:57 - 01:59 ]
"Doesn't that make both sides also wrong?" [ 02:00 - 02:03 ]
"Good and good and evil, truth can be very subjective, but the one thing we hope for in life is is that life itself is protected." [ 02:04 - 02:14 ]
"Life itself is cherished." [ 02:14 - 02:16 ]
"Uh What is it?" [ 02:18 - 02:19 ]
"Life liberty and the pursuit of happiness is cherished and supported by all sides." [ 02:19 - 02:26 ]
"A good war, what's the point of a good war?" [ 02:27 - 02:29 ]
"What how how should a good war work?" [ 02:30 - 02:33 ]
"Is a good war in the war economy getting the fighting, the bloody conflict out of the way as quickly as possible, avoiding it if possible." [ 02:34 - 02:44 ]
"If you have to engage in bloody conflict, get it done and get back to business quickly because isn't that what we all want to do anyway, is just get back to business." [ 02:44 - 02:57 ]
"Don't we all love you know, having a a breakfast on Sunday morning together, enjoying freedom." [ 02:57 - 03:07 ]
"From the distance Free Palestine." [ 03:09 - 03:12 ]
"Exactly." [ 03:14 - 03:15 ]
"So, a world of opposites, right?" [ 03:16 - 03:18 ]
"Looking uh looking at this suggestion, here's one." [ 03:20 - 03:24 ]
"This is out of my paygrade." [ 03:24 - 03:26 ]
"The unconsented to conversation being leveraged as a tool to for sweeping arrests, right?" [ 03:27 - 03:34 ]
"So the spirituality narrative, the unconsented to conversation, and uh law enforcement's sweeping arrests, right?" [ 03:36 - 03:45 ]
"Is this the right thing to do?" [ 03:46 - 03:48 ]
"Would the crime just resurface months later anyway?" [ 03:50 - 03:53 ]
"You know, how do we find out?" [ 03:55 - 03:56 ]
"How do we find out if we're making sweeping changes?" [ 03:57 - 03:59 ]
"Well, I can't answer that question, but it kind of does it not point to this category that is, maybe the opposite of what we thought was true." [ 04:00 - 04:11 ]
"Any any thoughts on that from the distance?" [ 04:11 - 04:13 ]
"I'm going to begin listening in three, two, one." [ 04:14 - 04:19 ]
"My experimentor had is on." [ 04:22 - 04:24 ]
"I understand what you're suggesting." [ 04:30 - 04:32 ]
"This is a very difficult one." [ 04:36 - 04:38 ]
"What is the point of this?" [ 04:44 - 04:45 ]
"To generate conversation." [ 04:48 - 04:50 ]
"I could move on to another one, to another from the author." [ 04:50 - 04:55 ]
"I can move on to a different topic, but I'm just putting that out there as a suggestion." [ 04:55 - 04:59 ]
"What do we do if we feel that that is an accurate statement?" [ 05:05 - 05:08 ]
"From the author, incredible response, exactly." [ 05:09 - 05:13 ]
"So, I would suggest uh just kind of this is why I asked suggest the experimenter hat." [ 05:15 - 05:21 ]
"There's a Japanese philosophy called Kaizen, the pursuit of constant improvement." [ 05:22 - 05:29 ]
"It's leveraged by organizations like Toyota." [ 05:29 - 05:32 ]
"It can be found in the startup mindset." [ 05:33 - 05:35 ]
"You have uh publications books like uh Eric Reese lean startup, where in general, you produce a piece of software, you produce a service knowing full well that the first iteration is most likely going to be destroyed, but the point of getting it out there is to collect information from people as quickly as possible." [ 05:36 - 05:58 ]
"And it's based on that first release of your service or your process." [ 05:58 - 06:03 ]
"Remember, all process is iterative." [ 06:04 - 06:06 ]
"It's it's considered to be an evolutionary thing." [ 06:07 - 06:10 ]
"Process always gets better." [ 06:10 - 06:12 ]
"And so what do you do in that situation?" [ 06:12 - 06:14 ]
"Well, the one thing that's very helpful in an organization is to embrace kind of this this iterative quality, right?" [ 06:16 - 06:23 ]
"The pursuit of constant improvement." [ 06:24 - 06:27 ]
"So, if you have that as a cultural pillar within your organization, getting out there with something is important, but everybody is excited to learn and iterate." [ 06:27 - 06:39 ]
"And it's the iteration that will be expected." [ 06:40 - 06:43 ]
"And so there really is no punishment for getting something wrong because the whole point of it was, you know, we knew that half of what we released, half of what we started with was going to go away, and we get learning what not to do in the beginning is not something you would punish someone for in this this type of culture." [ 06:44 - 07:06 ]
"It's something that you would reward someone for." [ 07:06 - 07:09 ]
"So, learning and insights being the currency." [ 07:09 - 07:13 ]
"Learning and insights being the currency that leads to revenue." [ 07:13 - 07:17 ]
"Uh what do you think of that from the distance?" [ 07:19 - 07:22 ]
"And of suggestion from author, returning to the repeating process in three, two, one." [ 07:23 - 07:31 ]
"I'm so impressed with what that person just suggested." [ 07:37 - 07:41 ]
"What else is in this category a world of opposites?" [ 07:47 - 07:53 ]
"Yes, let's continue this interested discussion and uh continued response from author." [ 07:57 - 08:04 ]
"So, looking at, um, this the topic of a telepathic extraction, right?" [ 08:05 - 08:10 ]
"Is a telepathic extraction a good idea in this situation?" [ 08:11 - 08:15 ]
"Well, again, this is outside of my paygrade, but what has the individual suggested?" [ 08:17 - 08:23 ]
"There was a comment from the distance." [ 08:24 - 08:25 ]
"public safety crisis from from the distance, which is what I've been suggesting the entire time." [ 08:28 - 08:35 ]
"Right? Returning to responses from from author." [ 08:36 - 08:38 ]
"This is what I've been suggesting the entire time when I'm approached with it is that there's a public safety crisis present." [ 08:39 - 08:46 ]
"So now when we look at kind of the lean startup or the Kaizen culture, what would the Kaizen culture say in this situation?" [ 08:46 - 08:53 ]
"Okay, let's try with someone uh a different approach." [ 08:54 - 08:59 ]
"Right? And there'd be no firing someone." [ 09:00 - 09:02 ]
"You wouldn't punish anyone or fire someone." [ 09:03 - 09:06 ]
"And in this culture you might if they refuse to change, but that would be true if the the organization itself was a believer in the the Kaizen approach of constant improvement or the lean startup thinking, right?" [ 09:07 - 09:25 ]
"So, uh and within that, you also have uh this world of opposites that is, well, we keep suggesting drugs to this person." [ 09:26 - 09:36 ]
"We keep suggesting drugs and homosexual opportunities, right?" [ 09:36 - 09:41 ]
"We keep suggesting those." [ 09:42 - 09:43 ]
"And so there's a there's a nuance here, a caveat, is that actually an offer?" [ 09:44 - 09:48 ]
"Right? an offer for an opportunity or is it just another predatory attempt to euthanize me?" [ 09:48 - 09:56 ]
"So in both scenarios, the uh the Kaizen approach would still be true." [ 09:57 - 10:03 ]
"Right? What's happening is a fixed belief is what's happening a fixed belief and organizational or group belief that drugs are attractive to the individual continues to play itself out in these expensive operations." [ 10:05 - 10:21 ]
"So what else would you do?" [ 10:23 - 10:25 ]
"Right? Not necessarily a world of opposites maybe we're looking at, but maybe skizo-effective disorder, uh unhealthy or unproductive pattern stemming from a fixed belief structure, an organizational belief." [ 10:27 - 10:46 ]
"What does everyone think of that in the distance?" [ 10:46 - 10:49 ]
"End of author comments returning to the repeating process in three, two, one." [ 10:50 - 10:58 ]
"That paraphrasing, that's absolutely the most incredible and relevant thing I have ever heard, Sean Christopher Harris." [ 11:08 - 11:16 ]
"That's exact paraphrasing additional comments." [ 11:28 - 11:30 ]
"That's exactly what continues to happen from the direction of these biotech uh contributors to the conversation." [ 11:31 - 11:40 ]
"Yes, that is how we are labeling those people." [ 11:45 - 11:49 ]
"And is there still repeating, still repeating, paraphrasing, is there organizational suffering from the results of this skizo effective disorder, this fixed belief?" [ 11:58 - 12:13 ]
"and how it's surfacing in the conversation." [ 12:17 - 12:21 ]
"That could also be considered military stubbornness." [ 12:27 - 12:31 ]
"Still repeating, still repeating." [ 12:31 - 12:33 ]
"This conversation, this conversation is getting to the crux of the matter." [ 12:40 - 12:46 ]
"Still repeating, still repeating, paraphrasing, I feel stupid for doing this, spending money on this same thing over and over and over." [ 13:03 - 13:13 ]
"Let's get this person his assistance as soon as humanly possible." [ 13:19 - 13:25 ]
"And remember, it's a growing population of people, not an individual, still repeating, still repeating." [ 13:30 - 13:39 ]
"Who is to blame, paraphrasing, who is to blame for euthanization in the city of Denver, everybody?" [ 13:48 - 13:58 ]
"And what does that have to do with Microsoft and Monsanto or Bayer Biotech?" [ 14:08 - 14:15 ]
"Still repeating, still repeating." [ 14:15 - 14:18 ]
"Do you have another example of this world of opposites response from the author, I do." [ 14:23 - 14:30 ]
"continuing, continuing uh suggestions from the author, another example of a world of opposites would be looking to this method of possibly and let me know what you think of this, looking to this method of communication as accurate information." [ 14:30 - 14:52 ]
"So there are a few things here." [ 14:52 - 14:53 ]
"One, if you're sitting in this observational seat, looking at someone's vitals, information from their eyes, you've got a connection to their brain, and believing that you have all the information you need, and you don't need to speak with them in person." [ 14:55 - 15:14 ]
"You don't because you already have what they would say." [ 15:15 - 15:19 ]
"Farahani describes this concern." [ 15:20 - 15:22 ]
"I think something she said in one of her interviews fits nicely here that when you're connected to a human being's brain, it's really difficult." [ 15:23 - 15:33 ]
"It requires just this expert toolkit to understand what's going on inside of someone's brain, but you would have to ask them uh in person about it." [ 15:33 - 15:45 ]
"So you for example, she uses this metaphor that I always this example of uh that you know, she's married and I think about strangling my husband." [ 15:46 - 15:56 ]
"Well, this could be misinterpreted as planning to murder somebody, for example, but it's a very normal human thought." [ 15:57 - 16:04 ]
"unless you talked with the human being about it, in person, right?" [ 16:05 - 16:09 ]
"And I mean, you you could ask them telepathically, but that invites the threat of euthanization in this situation and it also could be biased uh because they're afraid of speaking with you or they think you are someone that you're not, for example." [ 16:11 - 16:30 ]
"So the absence of the publicly facing relationship and the understood explanation, you could explain it, but it has to be understood, right?" [ 16:31 - 16:41 ]
"that it's telepathy, there's a human being there." [ 16:41 - 16:44 ]
"And so you know, is that the right setting to actually get information from someone?" [ 16:45 - 16:51 ]
"And it depends on the context, but talking with them about it could be the most direct and and uh, you know, providing the actual explanation as it is understood by the human being." [ 16:52 - 17:08 ]
"Right? So getting back to the question in this suggestion of a world of opposites, is the is the opposite true for the assumption that sitting in a position where you can observe a human being with a connection to their brain, observing their thought process, information from their eyes, all you need as far as information is concerned, or that you don't need them to explain in person, right?" [ 17:08 - 17:39 ]
"uh information from their brain that has surfaced." [ 17:40 - 17:44 ]
"Uh end of response end of suggestion from author." [ 17:45 - 17:49 ]
"Well, what do you think of that?" [ 17:49 - 17:50 ]
"Returning to the repeating process in three, two, one." [ 17:51 - 17:56 ]
"You're absolutely correct about this." [ 18:00 - 18:02 ]
"And we do have an organizational belief that we do not have to communicate with someone, connect with someone in person." [ 18:13 - 18:24 ]
"From the distance from another direction, no, you do not need that." [ 18:26 - 18:31 ]
"That is not the truth of it." [ 18:34 - 18:36 ]
"So there seems to be a difference of viewpoint here." [ 18:45 - 18:48 ]
"I'm going to leave it there." [ 18:49 - 18:51 ]
"I need to get inside and work." [ 18:51 - 18:53 ]
"Are there any closing comments for this recording?" [ 18:53 - 18:58 ]
"Was this valuable to talk about?" [ 18:58 - 19:00 ]
"It sounds like there's a contradiction here we could drill into uh that really deserves some attention." [ 19:01 - 19:07 ]
"I would suggest that if you're aware of each other, you know, enough, please consider talking about it, resolving that concern." [ 19:08 - 19:18 ]
"I would love to hear more about why." [ 19:18 - 19:20 ]
"Maybe that's a good use of time for the next five minutes." [ 19:20 - 19:23 ]
"Why does someone believe it's not necessary?" [ 19:23 - 19:27 ]
"Is this motivated by uh this perception that you need to maintain your covert status?" [ 19:28 - 19:37 ]
"or you know, is that more of of what is motivating your response?" [ 19:37 - 19:42 ]
"The need to remain hidden?" [ 19:42 - 19:45 ]
"Or do you really believe that you don't need, you wouldn't benefit from the human being understanding who you are and providing an explanation for information you are harvesting from their brain, your connection to their brain." [ 19:45 - 20:01 ]
"End of uh response from author going to continue the repeating process for one last round." [ 20:02 - 20:09 ]
"I would agree with that." [ 20:12 - 20:13 ]
"We are actually motivated by the need to remain hidden." [ 20:22 - 20:26 ]
"I think paraphrasing, I think we're all aware of the benefit from having the in person conversation where the person understands who we are and can explain what we're seeing in their brain." [ 21:40 - 22:02 ]
"We have to deal with this." [ 22:18 - 22:20 ]
"Still repeating, still repeating." [ 22:20 - 22:23 ]
"I have a closing comment." [ 22:26 - 22:27 ]
"This person's life is in serious physical danger." [ 22:33 - 22:36 ]
"If you have the ability to help this person, please do so as soon as humanly possible." [ 22:44 - 22:50 ]
"Still repeating, still repeating." [ 22:50 - 22:53 ]
"How are we going to approach this person for his euthanization?" [ 22:59 - 23:05 ]
"The hangman is going to approach this person and that will be the end of this conversation or the beginning of a new one." [ 23:13 - 23:25 ]
"How do you feel about that, Sean Christopher Harris?" [ 23:28 - 23:31 ]
"Response from author, uh, and there's a pattern of suggesting that the psychological violence will not end until one of two things happen, the facilitators of the so-called ugly workflows, all of them, there are multiple groups, that's the suggestion, are found and arrested, held accountable, and or the money, uh that's being provided, the revenue stream for the psychological violence and the forced euthanization dries up." [ 23:32 - 24:15 ]
"There's a pattern of suggestion around that." [ 24:16 - 24:18 ]
"Um so, my suggestion would be, you know, remember, what would you ask your 16-year-old child to do or just a young adult in America, a student, and remember, it's a growing population of people, it's not the individual." [ 24:20 - 24:39 ]
"You're stopping the spread of euthanization, not the method of communication, the psychological violence that is people being bombarded with high volume communication to force them to accept euthanization." [ 24:39 - 24:55 ]
"Right? It's a group of people you're saving." [ 24:57 - 24:59 ]
"You're stopping the spread at one end point." [ 24:59 - 25:01 ]
"think contact tracing." [ 25:01 - 25:03 ]
"I've suggested in the past, walking up to me, offering me information, right? Tell the individual they don't have to say anything." [ 25:04 - 25:12 ]
"Sequester yourself, send money." [ 25:13 - 25:15 ]
"If the person fails at sequestering themselves or they need help doing it, then consider a different approach." [ 25:16 - 25:22 ]
"Then they will have to go somewhere with someone potentially." [ 25:22 - 25:28 ]
"Right? But if they do well, Zoom calls." [ 25:29 - 25:34 ]
"Even the Zoom call itself could be threatening if it's facilitated by the wrong people." [ 25:34 - 25:39 ]
"It could be used to put someone in a sanitarium." [ 25:40 - 25:43 ]
"There's also an opportunity to present a couple people to be the targets of the facilitators of the so-called ugly workflows." [ 25:45 - 25:55 ]
"If you wants to connect and find out, connect with and find out who is facilitating euthanization, the people that show up in person, that stand in front of my eyeballs will probably be communicated with." [ 25:56 - 26:12 ]
"They will probably enter my world." [ 26:13 - 26:14 ]
"Please consider making sure that everyone is debriefed on being asked to do the bidding, the technology in use to whatever understanding, and and know that if you show up around someone who's being singled out and uh force to accept euthanization that they, you know, they could be asked to do the bidding or start experiencing the torment themselves." [ 26:15 - 26:42 ]
"If they are also experiencing that already, uh a group dynamic setting where you have a workflow in the home to reveal transparent, you know, bring transparency to what is said." [ 26:42 - 26:55 ]
"For example, a simple group chat where this group of people who are working on bringing consent to the conversation, maybe all of them are being targeted." [ 26:55 - 27:08 ]
"They share the text message every time they're communicated with." [ 27:08 - 27:12 ]
"So, for example, hey, Sean, someone suggested you are going to poison me at dinner." [ 27:12 - 27:18 ]
"You know, uh, oh, thank you for letting me know." [ 27:19 - 27:22 ]
"No, I'm not going to do that." [ 27:22 - 27:24 ]
"Uh I was asked to poison you at dinner." [ 27:25 - 27:28 ]
"Thank you for broaching that." [ 27:28 - 27:30 ]
"Do you still want to have dinner?" [ 27:30 - 27:31 ]
"No, it's actually very stressful to thought of it." [ 27:32 - 27:35 ]
"Thanks for asking." [ 27:35 - 27:36 ]
"or, hey, uh Sean, someone suggested you're masturbating in the bathroom, uh you know, look at it do pictures of B or thinking about B." [ 27:37 - 27:47 ]
"Can you talk about this with me?" [ 27:47 - 27:49 ]
"Uh no, I I wasn't thinking about you or masturbating." [ 27:50 - 27:54 ]
"Thanks for letting me know." [ 27:55 - 27:56 ]
"I I think you're talking with the terrorists." [ 27:56 - 27:59 ]
"That's the sort of thing or for example, a US Marshall shows up as part of Wsec." [ 28:00 - 28:06 ]
"Well, that person understand that the person speaking with them, hey, Sean, someone just asked me to uh shoot you and put you in the trunk and bury you somewhere outside." [ 28:06 - 28:18 ]
"They're willing to pay me $100,000." [ 28:18 - 28:20 ]
"I'm not going to do it." [ 28:21 - 28:23 ]
"Thanks for letting me know." [ 28:24 - 28:26 ]
"transparency in this situation, extremely valuable." [ 28:27 - 28:33 ]
"What what do you think about that on my way back to uh get this this information entered, one last round of feedback on potentially what this first contact could be?" [ 28:33 - 28:46 ]
"People with credentials like press, college credentials that don't show up with a psychiatrist, right? Technology professionals." [ 28:46 - 28:57 ]
"They're already going to have, or attorneys, there's already an existing understanding that attorneys remain separate from the client and this other point of contact, the person they're trying to help." [ 28:57 - 29:10 ]
"You know, work with established understandings for relationships." [ 29:10 - 29:14 ]
"Distance could be very helpful in the beginning and getting past this point together will learn how to approach other people." [ 29:14 - 29:24 ]
"Know that I am ready to work." [ 29:24 - 29:26 ]
"So, I'm going to do one more round of repeating and then shut the recording down." [ 29:27 - 29:31 ]
"That was just some some suggestions on what contact might look like and how you might move past the terrorism together." [ 29:31 - 29:39 ]
"returning to the repeating process one last time in three, two, one." [ 29:39 - 29:46 ]
"This is a fucking incredible conversation." [ 29:50 - 29:53 ]
"Yes, that's exactly what I said with 100% word for word accuracy." [ 30:00 - 30:04 ]
"Paraphrasing, I don't have anything else to add, but I am agree with you that uh working on building trust through the first step is very important." [ 30:16 - 30:28 ]
"Making the person feel comfortable is very important." [ 30:29 - 30:37 ]
"Thank you, thank you for doing this Sean Christopher Harris." [ 30:40 - 30:44 ]
"Okay, returning to comments, suggestions from author, thank you for your service everybody." [ 30:44 - 30:54 ]
"I refuse to believe that the protectors of the Commonwealth would ever invite a police brutality uh story of this caliber." [ 30:54 - 31:08 ]
"I believe in you, America." [ 31:08 - 31:10 ]
"Let's see what happens next." [ 31:10 - 31:11 ]
"at 1:20 p.m. October 2nd, Thursday October 2nd, 2025." [ 31:12 - 31:19 ]
"End of recording." [ 31:19 - 31:21 ]